"Thomas Lee Elifritz" wrote in message
om...


Then adjust the figures for inflation and recalculate.

And somehow take into account the higher probability of property damage due
to the greater populations along the shore. If you strangle the data enough
you might even get an apples to pomegranate comparison. Or you could just
use meteorological data.

It is not scientifically defensible.

The result still stands after recalculation, by the numbers, including
an unnamed tropical low that killed thousands, by damages, deaths,
number of storms, intensity of storms, duration,, size, frequency,
chronology of storms, etc., other metrics are indeed possible, I'm
sure any reasonable scientific estimation confirms that this is a
'relatively active' Atlantic Hurricane season. Only an idjit would
continue to debate the result.


No, I called you an idjit. You are also a Troll, and most probably a
Conchy Joe.

The refuge of the ignorant. I am so impressed.

September 14, 2004

Tim K. wrote:

Then adjust the figures for inflation and recalculate.



And somehow take into account the higher probability of property damage due
to the greater populations along the shore. If you strangle the data enough
you might even get an apples to pomegranate comparison. Or you could just
use meteorological data.

As opposed to you, who offer nothing but nonsense, I present :

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/deadly/

All you offer this newsgroup is nonsense.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net