It has been alleged that Joseph Bartlo woke up and
said:

It is really simple to avoid it - just post about weather, don't bother me,
and don't support those that do bother me unprovoked. Doesn't even matter
if anything you post is right or wrong. Is that so difficult ?

Mr. Bartlo, since you haven't posted about weather in some time, please add
yourself to the next list.

Thankyewverymuch.

ObWeather: Mt. Pocono, at 10:00 EST- 38 degrees with rain.

Joseph Bartlo wrote:

GaryM wrote:

Joseph Bartlo wrote in
:

Maybe you are becoming a pest also.

I would be honored to make your list.

It is really simple to avoid it - just post about weather, don't bother me,
and don't support those that do bother me unprovoked. Doesn't even matter
if anything you post is right or wrong. Is that so difficult ?

Hi, Foamy! When will you be posting about weather again? Dodgeball?
Snow shovelling? Driving? Golf?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

Joseph Bartlo wrote:

TQ wrote:

Wowzer, Ray! You/re giving Joey Buttmunch a real run for his money in this
thread.

What's next? A pest list?

I already proved you know almost nothing about statistics - now the question
seems to be if you are smart enough to add.

Foamy gets down and dirty!

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

Joseph Bartlo wrote:

GaryM wrote:

wrote in news:1112391638.479045.157960
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:


Disclaimer:

The thoughts and opinions expressed by me on the boards/groups are in
no way representative of AccuWeather, Inc. They are solely my own
thoughts and opinions as a private citizen, taxpayer and professional
meteorologist concerned about the quality of meteorological data.


And you think that protects you, do you? Hmmm, maybe the boy really is
*that* naive.

Maybe you are becoming a pest also.

Remember rec.sport.golf, Foamy?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

Joseph Bartlo wrote:

GaryM wrote:

Joseph Bartlo wrote in
:

Maybe you are becoming a pest also.

I would be honored to make your list.

It is really simple to avoid it - just post about weather, don't bother me,
and don't support those that do bother me unprovoked. Doesn't even matter
if anything you post is right or wrong. Is that so difficult ?

St. Foamy, will you also be issuing hell condemnations with a wave of
the magic wand of refutation?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:57:01 GMT,
Joseph Bartlo , in
wrote:
+ TQ wrote:
+
+ Wowzer, Ray! You/re giving Joey Buttmunch a real run for his money in this
+ thread.
+
+ What's next? A pest list?
+
+ I already proved you know almost nothing about statistics - now the question
+ seems to be if you are smart enough to add.

Hey, Josef, what do you know about adding? let's tackle the simple
questions before moving along to such complex notions as statistics...

....or are you just gonna try and mailbomb me again?

James
--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.

wrote in news:1112303968.041698.286830
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Gentlemen,

I apologize for my previous statements regarding deception.

However, I still maintain that, at least at the time I specified, the
ASOS at KTTN was not accurately portraying the weather at the airport,
based on nearby observations, evidence from the issued observation
from
KTTN, radar imagery, and information from several family members who
live within 2 miles of the airport.

I think that perhaps, a change in reporting practice from the ASOS
would be helpful for the user and observer. For example, when the ASOS
is standalone (AUTO), the following distress codes are issued at the
end of the observation during an instance such as what occured on
March
8:

SNEMM PWINO FZRANO

However, when the ASOS is in augmentation mode, the PWINO FZRANO are
not included, with only the SNEMM indicating a problem with the
sensors. This is also the case with other sensor distress codes, such
as TSNO.

I believe it would be in everyone's interests if this was changed so
that, even while the ASOS is being augmented, the sensor error codes
were displayed. This would alert the augmentor that there are problems
with the unit severely affecting performance requiring augmentation,
while alerting the end-user to be more skeptical of the observation.

=====
Raymond C. Martin, Jr.
Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/
New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/
Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/


This is much improved from your initial disrespectful approach. Perhaps
you should approach someone in the FAA with these ideas (sans words like
"disgust", "liar", etc.)

The question is....who will have a pset poast first

RayRay from AccuScare

or

JoJo from Mount Locono



place your bets kooks


"Ed" wrote in message
...
wrote in news:1112303968.041698.286830
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

Gentlemen,

I apologize for my previous statements regarding deception.

However, I still maintain that, at least at the time I specified, the
ASOS at KTTN was not accurately portraying the weather at the airport,
based on nearby observations, evidence from the issued observation
from
KTTN, radar imagery, and information from several family members who
live within 2 miles of the airport.

I think that perhaps, a change in reporting practice from the ASOS
would be helpful for the user and observer. For example, when the ASOS
is standalone (AUTO), the following distress codes are issued at the
end of the observation during an instance such as what occured on
March
8:

SNEMM PWINO FZRANO

However, when the ASOS is in augmentation mode, the PWINO FZRANO are
not included, with only the SNEMM indicating a problem with the
sensors. This is also the case with other sensor distress codes, such
as TSNO.

I believe it would be in everyone's interests if this was changed so
that, even while the ASOS is being augmented, the sensor error codes
were displayed. This would alert the augmentor that there are problems
with the unit severely affecting performance requiring augmentation,
while alerting the end-user to be more skeptical of the observation.

=====
Raymond C. Martin, Jr.
Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/
New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/
Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/


This is much improved from your initial disrespectful approach. Perhaps
you should approach someone in the FAA with these ideas (sans words like
"disgust", "liar", etc.)

Joseph Bar-Tholamai wrote:
The question is....who will have a pset poast first

RayRay from AccuScare

or

JoJo from Mount Locono



place your bets kooks

What does this have to do with the weather, Bar-Tholamai?

Dr. David Tholen wrote:
Joseph Bar-Tholamai wrote:

The question is....who will have a pset poast first

RayRay from AccuScare

or

JoJo from Mount Locono



place your bets kooks


What does this have to do with the weather, Bar-Tholamai?


40% chance of foam.

--
....And point out that he (Scott Richter) is a jerk.
You can quote me.
- Quaestor