Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As we all know, the Wright Brothers converted their old bicyle shop
into their shop where they built their first airplane. Where the hell was Belfort Instruments? Did they have a shop down the street at the corner deli??? And it can be found that the Wright Brothers relied on some British made instrumentation. For Belfort to enblazen such a statement on their T-shirts just displays their desperation to make a sale, at any cost! Maybe if they invented something worthwhile like the Wright Brothers, then they wouldn't need to advertise like this! Where is the written record that Belfort Instuments supplied the Wright Brothers with Instrumentation. I've heard of many crazy things before, but such advertising is utterly crazy! In fact, by their statements, they tend to diminish the great accomplishments of thes wonderful pioneers .... "The Wright Brothers Relied On Us."!!!!!!! Well, now I am convinced, Belfort Instruments oes really SUCK!!!!! If they were so great of a company, they could ride the wave of their own successes and NOT detract from other successful individuals! Maybe being in the red all of the time, promotes such unprofessional activity! Now, I ask the question! Does anyone out there, think that "The Wright Brothers Relied on Us" ... Belfort Instuments??? Does anyone think this, or believe this? Do you also find this devious attempt of association unethical? What a cry of failure! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I decided already -- you're a troll.
If you put half as much effort into your job as you did posting this rubbish to these newsgroups, you probably wouldn't be in this unemployed predicament in the first place. I say props to Belfort for saving money on personnel who waste too much time instead of doing something constructive! You also state that Belfort is in the red. Surely by this you mean losing money -- otherwise what would you have to bitch about now? Unless I failed economics, my 5 year old could ascertain that the lack of a minus sign or parenthesis next to their yearly net numbers would show that they're actually quite profitable. Actually, I'm becoming quite surprised that they hired you in the first place, nevermind terminating you. Belfort you do suck! ![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
killfile.
|
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why go with a follower when you choose from
among the Leaders in AWOS weather systems like: http://www.vaisala.com/businessareas/solutions/av iationweather/products/automatedweatherobservings ystems http://www.allweatherinc.com/aviation/awos_dom.ht ml http://www.superawos.com These three vendors have AWOS weather systems which have been "commissioned" by the FAA. Not every company can say that.... so do YOUR homework! Or you'll be sorry.... and CHECK OUT THIS VALID COMPARISON of AWOS: http://www.superawos.com/feature_comparison.htm WHY WASTE YOUR MONIES ON AN INFERIOR AWOS? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Wright Brothers Relied exclusively on a
Richard's Anemometer to record wind speed and direction. Here is a history documenting the definitive proof including a picture of Wilbur Wright actually using Richard's anemometer. DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU DIFFERENTLY! THE HISTORY: Octave Chanute responded to Wilbur's letter on May 12th, 1901. He suggested that Wilbur specify whether he wanted to use the English [Robinson, a cup type] or French anemometer [Richard of Paris, a rotating vane type] at the appropriate time. [An anemometer is an instrument used to determine the wind's speed. The English anemometer is a Robinson anemometer, a cup type. The French anemometer is by Richard of Paris and is a rotating vane type.] http://wings.avkids.com/Book/Wright/history1_1901 4.html WILBUR WRIGHT TO OCTAVE CHANUTE Dayton, Ohio, May 17, 1901 As to anemometer we are inclined to think that we would prefer the nonrecording Richard's instrument as our chief use for it will be measuring velocities for very brief periods. http://invention.psychology.msstate.edu/inventors /i/Wrights/library/Chanute_Wright_correspond/1901 /May17-1901.html RICHARD ANEMOMETER The Wrights borrowed this French-made, hand-held anemometer from Octave Chanute and used it to measure wind speeds during their flight tests at Kitty Hawk. http://www.nasm.si.edu/wrightbrothers/fly/1900/te stflying.cfm TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1903 An anemometer, or wind gauge, is an instrument for measuring the force and speed of wind. The earliest anemometer was invented by Thomas Romney Robinson (1793 - 1882). This gauge uses an arrangement of cups on a spindle to detect the wind and a series of clockwork connections to translate the speed of the rotating cups to a wind speed value. Octave Chanute, the Wright's French colleague, brought them a later anemometer made by Richard of Paris. http://www.centennialofflight.gov/2003FF/sept.htm l WRITINGS OF THE WRIGHT BROTHERS (Final Prep) We had a "Richard" hand anemometer with which we measured the velocity of the wind. Measurements made just before starting the first flight (December 17, 1903) showed velocities of 11 to 12 meters per second, or 24 to 27 miles per hour. Measurements made just before the last flight (December 17, 1903) gave between 9 and 10 meters per second. One made just after showed a little over 8 meters. WILBUR WRIGHT WITH RICHARD'S ANEMOMETER (picture) http://www.exn.ca/FlightDeck/Aviators/wright3.cfm How about this blog: http://digi****.blog.cz/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're sick
wrote in message ... Why go with a follower when you choose from among the Leaders in AWOS weather systems like: http://www.vaisala.com/businessareas/solutions/av iationweather/products/automatedweatherobservings ystems http://www.allweatherinc.com/aviation/awos_dom.ht ml http://www.superawos.com These three vendors have AWOS weather systems which have been "commissioned" by the FAA. Not every company can say that.... so do YOUR homework! Or you'll be sorry.... and CHECK OUT THIS VALID COMPARISON of AWOS: http://www.superawos.com/feature_comparison.htm WHY WASTE YOUR MONIES ON AN INFERIOR AWOS? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe we should just call you Ba-****, huh Mr. Bashir Salamati?
Belfort Instrument President Mark Decker gave me a DigiWx tee-shirt this past summer at the SATS demo in Danville, Virginia and it reads: "The Wright Brothers relied on us. December 17, 1903, Wind NE at 21 mph" while the Wright Brothers personally wrote on December 17, 1903: "We had a 'Richard' hand anemometer with which we measured the velocity of the wind. Measurements made just before starting the first flight showed velocities of 11 to 12 meters per second, or 24 to 27 miles per hour. Measurements made just before the last flight gave between 9 and 10 meters per second. One made just after showed a little over 8 meters." And then there is that indisputable pictu WILBUR WRIGHT USING A RICHARD'S ANEMOMETER (picture) http://www.exn.ca/FlightDeck/Aviators/wright3.cfm You won't find a picture of the Belfort/Friez weather station (circa 1897-1913) with the Wright Brothers in the background or the foreground because there isn't one! In fact, there is no direct evidence (written or otherwise) that Belfort or Friez ever had a weather station at Kitty Hawk, NC in December 1903. And there is no direct evidence (written or otherwise) that the US Weather Bureau ever bought the Belfort/Friez weather station and placed it in use on the outer banks of North Carolina. The Wright Brothers chose the outer banks of North Carolina for three reasons: 1) they needed a large open space to conduct their flight experiments 2) they needed a soft landing environment which "beach sand" provided, and 3) they needed steady winds which all beaches usually have. Additionally, Belfort claims to have been founded in 1876. Yet, Julien Friez never made it to Baltimore until at least 1890 according to: http://www.colby.edu/sts/97guide/sm_nmah.html "Julien Pierre Friez (1852-1916) was born in France and came to the United States at the age of 15. He worked with Robert Henning in Ottawa, Illinois on telegraphy equipment, circa 1868; later he was a foreman for Ottomar Mergentheler, circa 1880-1890. After leaving Mergentheler, Friez moved to Baltimore where he set up Belfort Laboratories and began a manufacture of scientific instruments. He later acquired an interest in meteorology and did important work on the design and manufacture of meteorological recording instruments." Lastly, Belfort claims to be "The Oldest Weather Company in the World" yet the earliest anemometer was invented by Thomas Romney Robinson (1793 - 1882). Mr. Robinson invented his anemometer in 1846 before Julian Friez even was born six years later in 1852. I think that makes Mr. Robinson the creator of "The Oldest Weather Company in the World." http://www.universityscience.ie/page...y_robinson.php How disingenuous can a company get ????????????????????????? Belfort Instrument Company is FULL OF IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Too bad they had to "hijack" their fabled company history while taking away from the accomplishments and endeavors of the Wright Brothers and from Thomas Romney Robinson! HOW LOW CAN YOU GO ?????????????????????????? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, Skylune, I too, am very PROUD of your enlightened decision! I'm
sure you will not be sorry! As far as labeling this person as Troll of the Year? Maybe you should be labelling them as "Truth and Safety First"! Ah, maybe you'll even thank him one day too! Skylune wrote: OK, I give up. You win the Troll of the Year Award! jgrove and I are weak competition. Next time I fly in the 172, I will make sure that we don't use any airports that have purchased (or are "demo-ing") a Belfort system. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were considering a DigiWx AWOS and a SuperAWOS. I was sold on DigiWx
AWOS until I started talking with DigiWx users who had the DigiWx VOICE option including Huntington UT, Annapolis MD, Monticello UT and Ocean City, NJ after I saw the comparison at http://www.superawos.com/feature_comparison.htm. SuperAWOS told me I wouldn't find any happy users and I didn't! All four airports report DigiWx VOICE as not working greater than 90% of the time. I did hear one user say that DigiWx had mic clicks available. But SuperAWOS say DigiWx mic clicks is not automatically adaptive --- only manually adaptive which means there has to be somebody available to alter the message length on an Automated Unicom transmission. Considering all the other things I have been hearing about DigiWx and the Belfort Instrument Company, I believe we will be pursuing the SuperAWOS product instead even though it costs more. But like someone already said, buy **** and you'll have ****! We don't want any DigiWx turds around on our airport! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Will Belfort Instruments become Kukucka Instruments? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Does Belfort Instruments outright lie in their advertising??? YOU DECIDE! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Belfort Instruments and their T-shirt advertising ... you decide! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Belfort Instruments and their T-shirt advertising ... you decide! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Gobble, Gobble .... Belfort Instruments used by the Wright Brothers! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |