Roger Coppock wrote:
Here, from Hadley Centre, are the global sea surface
temperatures from 1850 to 2006. Please see:

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/HadSST2gl.jpg

As predicted by Arrhenius over a century ago,
the rate of sea warming is slower than global land
warming. NASA GISS has global land surface
warming at .58K/per century between 1880 and
2006. (Please see:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts.txt)

These data come from:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/

There are no urban centers in the sea, but watch
the fossil fools blame this on UHI anyway.

What is or isn't important about global sea surface temperatures?

Peter Franks wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:
Here, from Hadley Centre, are the global sea surface
temperatures from 1850 to 2006. Please see:

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/HadSST2gl.jpg

As predicted by Arrhenius over a century ago,
the rate of sea warming is slower than global land
warming. NASA GISS has global land surface
warming at .58K/per century between 1880 and
2006. (Please see:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts.txt)

These data come from:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/

There are no urban centers in the sea, but watch
the fossil fools blame this on UHI anyway.

What is or isn't important about global sea surface temperatures?

Is the difference in temp between the sea and the land the same over
your data set?

--
http://OutSourcedNews.com
I suppose I could buy meteor insurance too, to help rebuild on that
impact crater, destined to be where my house is.


Our constitution protects criminals, sexual deviants and U.S. Senators.
Which at times are, one and the same...

The problem with the global warming theory, is that a theory is like a
bowl of ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bull**** to ruin the
whole thing. - Gump That -

How to outsmart Global Warming -- Plant your corn when the oak leaves
are as big as a squirrels ear.

Insanity is only synapses deep.
It's not if, it's just when, No one gets out alive.

"ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
All over this thread. Falsification of the atmospheric CO2 greenouse
effects within the frame of physics.

You know. The thread (and others) you created in order to claim that
temperature doesn't exist because it's oooooh, sooooo, Complicated...

Ahahahahahahahahah..


wrote in message
I created this thread?

Ahahahaha.. And now the Kwag Fag can't figure out the difference between
"tread" and "this thread.


wrote in message
You are a moron; enough time's been wasted on you. Ahahaha?

3 more AmeriKKKans did in Iraq yesterday. Such a pleasure.

On Sep 12, 9:04 pm, "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote:
"ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"

All over this thread. Falsification of the atmospheric CO2 greenouse
effects within the frame of physics.

You know. The thread (and others) you created in order to claim that
temperature doesn't exist because it's oooooh, sooooo, Complicated...

Ahahahahahahahahah..
wrote in message
I created this thread?

Ahahahaha.. And now the Kwag Fag can't figure out the difference between
"tread" and "this thread.

wrote in message
You are a moron; enough time's been wasted on you. Ahahaha?

3 more AmeriKKKans did in Iraq yesterday. Such a pleasure.

So let's sum up Scott Nudds: homophobe, necrophiliac and poor typist.
You're a real prize. Let me guess that you're not married. LMAO!

On Sep 12, 9:04 pm, "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote:
3 more AmeriKKKans did in Iraq yesterday. Such a pleasure.


wrote
So let's sum up Scott Nudds: homophobe, necrophiliac and poor typist.
You're a real prize. Let me guess that you're not married. LMAO!

Arctic ice melt opens Northwest Passage By JAMEY KEATEN, AP

PARIS - Arctic ice has shrunk to the lowest level on record, new satellite
images show, raising the possibility that the Northwest Passage that eluded
famous explorers will become an open shipping lane.

The European Space Agency said nearly 200 satellite photos this month taken
together showed an ice-free passage along northern Canada, Alaska and
Greenland, and ice retreating to its lowest level since such images were
first taken in 1978.

"The strong reduction in just one year certainly raises flags that the ice
(in summer) may disappear much sooner than expected," Pedersen said in an
ESA statement posted on its Web site Friday.

Pedersen said the extreme retreat this year suggested the passage could
fully open sooner than expected - but ESA did not say when that might be.
Efforts to contact ESA officials in Paris and Noordwik, the Netherlands,
were unsuccessful Saturday.

A U.N. panel on climate change has predicted that polar regions could be
virtually free of ice by the summer of 2070 because of rising temperatures
and sea ice decline, ESA noted.

.....

Until now, the passage has been expected to remain closed even during
reduced ice cover by multiyear ice pack - sea ice that remains through one
or more summers, ESA said.

....

Peter Franks wrote:
Roger Coppock wrote:
Here, from Hadley Centre, are the global sea surface
temperatures from 1850 to 2006. Please see:

http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/HadSST2gl.jpg

As predicted by Arrhenius over a century ago,
the rate of sea warming is slower than global land
warming. NASA GISS has global land surface
warming at .58K/per century between 1880 and
2006. (Please see:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts.txt)

These data come from:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/

There are no urban centers in the sea, but watch
the fossil fools blame this on UHI anyway.

What is or isn't important about global sea surface temperatures?

"The SST changes primarily have important biological implications for
hospitable/inhospitable conditions for many organisms including species
of plankton, seagrasses, shellfish, fish and mammals. Although the SST
changes are short-lived their ramifications are still not well understood."

http://www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/cohab/hurricane/sst.htm

Doesn't sound like much to me...

Peter Franks wrote:

Doesn't sound like much to me...

Of course it doesn't, you're a crackpot.

--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

kT wrote:
Peter Franks wrote:

Doesn't sound like much to me...

Of course it doesn't, you're a crackpot.

Well then, enlighten me.

Peter Franks wrote:
kT wrote:
Peter Franks wrote:

Doesn't sound like much to me...

Of course it doesn't, you're a crackpot.

Well then, enlighten me.

That's throwing down the gauntlet.

--
http://OutSourcedNews.com
It's what you learn, after you know it all, that counts.