"mrbawana2u" wrote
When are YOU going to do something about it?

Oh, I already have, by reducing my carbon emissions to near sustainable
levels, and have plans to lower them further.

How about you?

Oh, I even have plans to force you to do so.

"Peter Franks" wrote
More rain is good news.

Even if it falls on the glaciers of greenland and Antarctica?

..

On Sep 10, 2:20 am, "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote:
"mrbawana2u" wrote

When are YOU going to do something about it?

Oh, I already have, by reducing my carbon emissions to near sustainable
levels, and have plans to lower them further.

Inflation cutting into your welfare, scuttle nutts?

How about you?

My carbon emissions grow every year.
Prosperity does that.
I look forward to burning leafs soon.
Cheap co2.

Oh, I even have plans to force you to do so.

Failures begats failure.

"ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans" wrote:
Oh, I already have, by reducing my carbon emissions to near sustainable
levels, and have plans to lower them further.


"mrbawana2u" wrote
Inflation cutting into your welfare, scuttle nutts?

My work income is keeping pace with inflation. But not so the poor
AmeriKKKan public, who have not only witnessed a real decline in wages over
the BushCo era, but have on top of that loss experienced a near 40% decline
in the value of the AmeriKKKan dollar on the world stage and hence the value
of their net worth.

Ahahahahaha... That's some impressive record for you RepubliKKKans to be
proud of.

Seldom has the world seen such remarkable fiscal mismanagement as we have
seen with the absolutely corrupt AmeriKKKan RepubliKKKan party.



"mrbawana2u" wrote
My carbon emissions grow every year.

Doing your part to keep the Arab nations and the Soviet Union, and the
socialist oil producing states rolling in cash ay?

Excellent.




"mrbawana2u" wrote
Prosperity does that.

Tell that to the AmeriKKKan steel industry that has been priced out of
existance largely due to it's reliance on old energy intensive production
methods.


"mrbawana2u" wrote
I look forward to burning leafs soon.

I just let them rot where they fall. Better for the soil and with the
same carbon footprint.

Raking leaves is for old men who have nothing better to do with their
lives. You know like Ronald Reagan who spend we are told much of the end of
his life raking leaves while the U.S. SS stood behind him empting the bags
to give the Alzhimers ridden koot something to do.


"mrbawana2u" wrote
Failures begats failure.

So your children are losers to ay?

Scott Nudds aka "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote in message
...

wrote to VD Scotty:
Inflation cutting into your welfare, scuttle nutts?

[Scuttle Nutts to Prof. Bawana]
My work income is keeping pace with inflation.

[hanson]
ahahahaha... VD Scotty, you.... "work"?... AHAHAHAHA...
You mean it's your late welfare checKKK from AmeriKKKA
that is worKKKing you up!... Here is even more to worKKK
you, so that you can sKKKuttle your Nutts again, and it
worKKKs liKKKe clocKKK worKKK on you, every time...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...062159e?hl=en&

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...f1c505ad?hl=en

ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahahanson

,

"hanson" wrote Absolutely Nothing.

Meanwhile as the Globe Warms....

Bush outlines his financial connections to Afghan opium production.

Afghan poppy industry eludes U.S. control - CNN.com /asia

September 7, 2007 Afghan poppy industry eludes U.S. controlStory
Highlights


NANGARHAR, Afghanistan -- In a small district in southern Afghanistan,
U.S.-backed Afghan drug forces opened fire on farmers who were blocking
roads
and throwing rocks to protest the destruction of their poppy fields earlier
this
year. Scores were injured in the firefight.

A farmer stands in an illegal opium producing poppy farm one hour away from
Jalalabad, Afghanistan.

1 of 3 more photos » Undeterred by the violence, a group of angry farmers
gathered around Masood Azizi, the Afghan official supervising the
eradication.
They maintained that cultivating poppy for opium is the only way they can
survive. "We are hungry, thirsty, and we don't have any money. We are in
debt,"
one said.

It's a message that reverberates throughout this impoverished, war-torn
country.
Poppy production in this part of Afghanistan -- the Nangarhar province --
was
nearly wiped out in 2005, but it rebounded this year with a staggering
increase
of 285 percent, according to a new report from the United Nations Office on
Drugs and Crime report.

Eradicating opium poppies has been a key pillar of U.S. policy in
Afghanistan
since 2004, said Doug Wankel, director of the U.S. Counter-Narcotics Task
Force
in Afghanistan.

Yet today, Afghanistan produces roughly 93 percent of the world's illicit
opium,
according to the UNODC report, and the Taliban are making inroads in remote
areas of the country thanks, in part, to proceeds from the drug trade.
Check
out some top provinces for opium production »

Experts say more farmers are producing poppies because they have been unable
to
earn a living by growing other crops like wheat and vegetables. They say
that
the money promised by Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the international
community to plant these alternative crops has not materialized. Tour an
illegal poppy farm during harvest season »

"Not only are they back to cultivating poppy because they did not receive
any
alternative livelihoods, but they're angry at the broken promises, and they
don't trust us anymore," said Norine MacDonald of SENLIS, an international
think
tank focusing on drug policy.

Afghanistan's Addiction

Anderson Cooper traces the opium journey, from poppy flower to addict. A
deadly
drug pushing a country into crisis.

"You can try to kill us, but we will still grow poppy," one farmer told CNN.
Afghan poppies, which start as flowers in farmers' fields and often wind up
as
heroin on U.S. streets, fuel a $3 billion a year industry in Afghanistan.
The
industry is filling the coffers of the Taliban, the group who gave safe
haven to
al Qaeda before and after 9/11, and it is destabilizing the Afghan
government.
Learn how poppies are turned into heroin »

"The Taliban pretty much were ancient history four years ago, and now they
are
back, because they are deriving money from the drug trade," said Peter
Bergen, a
CNN terrorism analyst.

Disenchanted farmers find ready allies in the Taliban, who provide
protection
for them and their fields. Both groups align with drug lords who provide
upfront
money and credit for crops, pay farmers cash, and after the harvest, pick up
the
opium themselves. For farmers who may not even own trucks to get crops to
market, this service is invaluable.

"Drug eradication is a fantastic opportunity for the Taliban," said Peter
Jouvenal, a British journalist who has reported from Afghanistan for more
than
two decades. "It gives them the opportunity to recruit farmers that are fed
up
with these foreigners coming in and destroying their land."
U.S. officials claim a lack of opportunity is no excuse for farmers to break
the
law.

"Look, we know you need development and that is coming, but the lack of
development is not an excuse to go against the constitution, to break the
law,
to support the enemy," said Wankel. "I mean, that's part of the message that
goes out to the people."

Wankel's goal is to wipe out enough poppy fields that farmers will think
twice
before they plant poppies again. Less than 10 percent were destroyed last
year.
The U.N. estimates that eradication of 25 percent of the poppy crop would
start
to turn the tide. See photos of eradication efforts »

The Taliban use their share of drug proceeds to build up their forces in the
frontier provinces in the southern part of the country, which is also home
to
the most poppy production. This puts pressure on local governments as well
as
President Karzai's government in Kabul. It also enables the Taliban to hire
forces to attack U.S. and NATO troops.

"This place has shown itself to be something very, very usable for the
fundamentalists to operate from to do whatever is necessary to continue
their
war of terrorism," Wankel said.

American officials are cautious about connecting Taliban drug money to al
Qaeda-sponsored terrorism outside of Afghanistan. But Afghan officials say
there
is little doubt that some money reaches the terrorist organization.

"The drug [money] is directly funding terrorism. The drug is directly
funding
the Taliban, and I wouldn't differentiate between the al Qaeda and the
Taliban,"
said Mirwais Yasini, the former Afghan counter-narcotics minister.

In the past year, U.S. and Afghan counter-narcotics officials have placed a
new
emphasis on targeting drug kingpins, even those who are government
officials. In
June, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officers and Afghan agents
arrested
Abdul Khaliq, a provincial police chief. The bust netted 30 kilos of heroin,
worth roughly $1.5 million on the streets of the United States.

Wankel warns that not containing the drug trade that funds the Taliban
insurgency could have wider consequences: "We lose this government, we could
have another 9/11 here, so we have to succeed not only for Afghanistan, but
for
the region and for the world." E-mail to a friend
CNN's Jason White contributed to this report from New York.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:57:25 -0700, mrbawana2u
wrote:


I look forward to burning leafs soon.

I burn leafs every afternoon.

Exterminate -- I agree that the Bush administration is awful; they've
done all of the evil economic deeds you're talking about, and I hope
you and others kick their butts in the next election.

But why don't you stick to the topic of this usenet group, which is
"alt.global-warming"?

When you post a lot of partisan political statements in the
"alt.global-warming" group, you probably are giving a lot of people
the impression that global warming is a
partisan issue --

Meaning that all good Republicans and all good Bush supporters can
supposedly ignore it: "Hey, it's only a LIB-RAL DEMOCRATIC plot."

And it isn't. I wouldn't vote for most of these guys, but there are
Republicans as well as Democrats in the US who are waking up to the
danger of the climate change situation. And, in some cases, to the
economic advantages that their states may gain by moving to address
the climate change and CO2 situation.

Examples of Republicans who have been taking important steps at the
state level to deal with CO2 emissions and climate change now include
Charlie Crist, Republican governor of Florida; Tim Pawlenty, GOP
governor of Florida, and of course California's GOP governor Arnold
Schwarznegger.

On the national level, meanwhile, GOP senator and presidential hopeful
John McCain has been speaking the truth on AGW for some time now, and
has co-sponsored legislation to deal with it.

None of these Republicans is secretly doing "LIB RAL" & Democratic
bidding on this issue, Exterminate. McCain is pretty damned
conservative on most issues, and so apparently is Crist.

But they're also smart enough and honest enough to recognize the
threat that CO2-driven climate change poses to their states, and
indeed to the whole country, and so they're formulating "Republican"
approaches to it.

Given that the American electorate has recently been pretty evenly
divided between Republicans and Democrats, I think you need to be
acknowledging the CLIMATE contributions that these GOP politicians are
making.

Otherwise, you're just playing into the game of the AGW Deniers, and
putting a "Democratic" tag on the issue of climate change that is
guaranteed to keep millions of Americans from taking it seriously.


On Sep 11, 7:24 pm, "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote:
"ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans" wrote:
Oh, I already have, by reducing my carbon emissions to near sustainable
levels, and have plans to lower them further.

"mrbawana2u" wrote

Inflation cutting into your welfare, scuttle nutts?

My work income is keeping pace with inflation. But not so the poor
AmeriKKKan public, who have not only witnessed a real decline in wages over
the BushCo era, but have on top of that loss experienced a near 40% decline
in the value of the AmeriKKKan dollar on the world stage and hence the value
of their net worth.

Ahahahahaha... That's some impressive record for you RepubliKKKans to be
proud of.

Seldom has the world seen such remarkable fiscal mismanagement as we have
seen with the absolutely corrupt AmeriKKKan RepubliKKKan party.

"mrbawana2u" wrote

My carbon emissions grow every year.

Doing your part to keep the Arab nations and the Soviet Union, and the
socialist oil producing states rolling in cash ay?

Excellent.

"mrbawana2u" wrote

Prosperity does that.

Tell that to the AmeriKKKan steel industry that has been priced out of
existance largely due to it's reliance on old energy intensive production
methods.

"mrbawana2u" wrote

I look forward to burning leafs soon.

I just let them rot where they fall. Better for the soil and with the
same carbon footprint.

Raking leaves is for old men who have nothing better to do with their
lives. You know like Ronald Reagan who spend we are told much of the end of
his life raking leaves while the U.S. SS stood behind him empting the bags
to give the Alzhimers ridden koot something to do.

"mrbawana2u" wrote

Failures begats failure.

So your children are losers to ay?

Scott Nudds aka "ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans"
wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote Absolutely Nothing.

Meanwhile as the Globe Warms...

..... like this here which warms & worms you even more, Scuttle Nutts...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...062159e?hl=en&

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.g...f1c505ad?hl=en

ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahahanson

On Sep 12, 9:53 am, David wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:57:25 -0700, mrbawana2u
wrote:



I look forward to burning leafs soon.

I burn leafs every afternoon.

The buds work much better.