31 August 2007

RECORD EVENT REPORTS FROM NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DATA

NEW PREVIOUS YEAR OF
LOCATION RECORD RECORD PREVIOUS

STATIONS SETTING (OR TIED) A NEW RECORD HIGH TEMPERATU

ALTA, UT 78 76 1995
BURBANK, CA 106 TIE 106 1967
CASPER, WY 94 TIE 94 1954
ELSINORE, CA 111 110 1995
FRESNO-YOSEMITE AP, CA 107 106 1988
INDIO FS, CA 116 113 1998
MODESTO, CA 104 103 1958
** ** ****
STATIONS SETTING (OR TIED) A NEW RECORD LOW TEMPERATU

** ** ****
STATIONS SETTING (OR TIED) A NEW RECORD HIGH MINIMUM TEMPERATU

ALPINE, UT 67 61 1984
BAKERSFIELD, CA 80 78 1967
BELGRADE FIELD, MT 54 53 1984
DILLON AP, MT 58 56 1940
FERRON, UT 63 62 1995
FRESNO YOSEMITE AP, CA 75 TIE 75 1972
MODESTO, CA 77 66 1996
NEPHI, UT 66 TIE 66 1960
PHOENIX, AZ 91 89 1998
PROVO BYU, UT 70 65 1998
RANDOLPH, UT 54 44 1984
RED BLUFF, CA 71 70 1943
SACRAMENTO DNTN, CA 76 68 1972
SACRAMENTO AP, CA 71 66 1988
SAINT JOHNS, AZ 64 TIE 64 1922
SALT LAKE CITY AP, UT 73 71 1998
SHOW LOW, AZ 66 63 1996
SPANISH FORK, UT 69 66 1960
STOCKTON, CA 75 71 1915
WEST YELLOWSTONE, MT 51 47 1963
** ** ****
STATIONS SETTING (OR TIED) A NEW RECORD LOW MAXIMUM TEMPERATU

** ** ****
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daily high and low records from the U.S. HCN may be found he
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...ords/index.php

Number of Record Highs = 38
Number of Record Lows = 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:32:31 -0800, David wrote:

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...Records+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?

Hey, Usenet newsgroups are text format groups, some
people read them in ASCII and some read them as DOS text
files, the whole world is not HTML.

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...Records+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?

In article , says...

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...itted=Get+Reco
rds+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?

I'm not doing that. The link to the NCDC gives additional data
that extends the NWS data which I compile. Neither is in a
spreadsheet, BTW.

--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------

David wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...Records+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?

Because we like it that way, so **** off.


--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

David wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:50:47 -0500, kT wrote:

David wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...Records+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?
Because we like it that way, so **** off.

Who is ''we''?

Us.

Why the hostility?

Because you are a whiner.

--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:50:47 -0500, kT wrote:

David wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...Records+%C2%BB

Why do you insist on pasting a spreadsheet into a plain text
document? Why not just the link?

Because we like it that way, so **** off.

Who is ''we''?

Why the hostility?

EXTRA! EXTRA! HEAR ALL ABOUT IT!

SPREADSHEET CONTROVERSY ROILS CLIMATE COMMUNITY;

OVERSHADOWS DEBATE OVER GREENHOUSE EFFECT:

"This overwhelming issue of spreadsheet abuse," comments one GW
Contrarian,
"puts in dispute all of the research that the IPCC has done on
temperature trends
for the past 15 years. It is shocking -- simply shocking!"

As Category 5 Hurricanes Traverse Caribbean, Drought Hits California,
Will Homeland Security Launch Probe into Spreadsheet Inconvenience?

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:

31 August 2007

RECORD EVENT REPORTS FROM NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DATA

NEW PREVIOUS YEAR OF
LOCATION RECORD RECORD PREVIOUS

STATIONS SETTING (OR TIED) A NEW RECORD HIGH TEMPERATU

ALTA, UT 78 76 1995
BURBANK, CA 106 TIE 106 1967
CASPER, WY 94 TIE 94 1954
ELSINORE, CA 111 110 1995
FRESNO-YOSEMITE AP, CA 107 106 1988
INDIO FS, CA 116 113 1998
MODESTO, CA 104 103 1958
================================================== =============
You keep posting these numbers as though they're meaningful. Let's
look at Modesto to see if that is, in fact, true.
From the above you're implying that there is record warm spell
occurring in that city. But, that's really not the case.
104 is a record for the 31st of August mainly because 103 set in 1958
was the fourth lowest high temperature record set for August.
In the month of August there are 26 other days that match or exceed
104 degrees. Within several days of August 31st you have 105 & 106 in
1931, 104 in 1944, 105 in 1981, 106 on the 30th in 1988.
The first three day records in September were set in the 50's of 103,
106, 105.

In other words, I personally feel that you're wasting your time.

Also, do you notice that when they show "Ties" it's only with one
previous year. The same temperature reading in previous years does
not get carried forward.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:00:35 +0000 (UTC),
(Eric Swanson) wrote:


In other words, I personally feel that you're wasting your time.

I suppose you are correct, science is a waste of time these days. There
are so many idiots like you posting that there's no point in attempting
ANY serious discussion. For example, there were quite a few records
set that day, yet, you pick just one and ignore the fact that the date
was the last day of the month, which is at the end of the summer and the
beginning of Fall and cooler weather. Why you would think it relevant
to compare all of August with the last day is beyond me.

--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------