"Steve Thomas" wrote
What are you going to charge him with again?

Treason. War Crimes. Violating his oath of office.

On May 20, 4:07*am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Steve Thomas" wrote

*What are you going to charge him with again?

*Treason. *War Crimes. *Violating his oath of office.

And the evidence is?

Steve Thomas wrote:
On May 20, 4:07 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Steve Thomas" wrote

What are you going to charge him with again?
Treason. War Crimes. Violating his oath of office.


And his excessive use of carbon fuel.



And the evidence is?

In sci.environment, V-for-Vendicar

wrote
on Mon, 19 May 2008 17:07:20 -0400
:

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote
Execution of President Bush? For what?

Treason. War Crimes.


Be more specific. Granted, one might make a good case that
invasion of a generally neutral country for no particularly
good reason (a war of aggression) is a war crime, and we
might be comforting the enemy in an indirect fashion; perjury
is also possible though no courts were involved while Bush was
making his case to the people.

The courts, however, need something a little more than that.

Plus, there's more important issues to worry about, like
lapel pins, wives, and church preachers. ;-) Oh, wait,
economic slowdowns, foreclosures, sky high gas prices,
maybe, too.

--
#191,
Linux. Because life's too short for a buggy OS.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

In sci.environment, Steve Thomas

wrote
on Mon, 19 May 2008 18:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
:
On May 20, 4:07*am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"Steve Thomas" wrote

*What are you going to charge him with again?

*Treason. *War Crimes. *Violating his oath of office.

And the evidence is?

Evidence? We've yet to agree on precisely what the charges are!
I can point in the general direction of a war on aggression
and lying to the American people about the reasons of initiating same,
but that's about it. I need more specifics.

There is also the question of intent. Presumably, Bush thought it
was the best thing to do at the time...?

--
#191,
Linux. Because life's too short for a buggy OS.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Treason. War Crimes. Violating his oath of office.


"Steve Thomas" wrote
And the evidence is?

War, Murder, Death, Lies, Torture, Secret Wiretaps, Protest Zones, and
Arrests of innocent AmeriKKKans.

"The Ghost In The Machine" wrote
Then again...justice delayed is justice denied. Perhaps
we're waiting to indict him after he steps out of office,
but if so, it's annoying.

You mean Execute him after he leaves office.

On May 20, 11:31*am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
Treason. War Crimes. Violating his oath of office.

"Steve Thomas" wrote

*And the evidence is?

*War,

Legal war.



Murder,


Cite?



Death,


Who?


Lies,


What lies?



Torture,


Lies on your part.


Secret Wiretaps,


wiretaps are supposed to be by definition "secret" but he never
wiretapped domestic calls so your just a KKKommie DhimmiKKK-rat liar.



Protest Zones,



Tinfoil hat zones?



and
Arrests of innocent AmeriKKKans.


Happens every day Sherlock wake up and smell the coffee, your not
gonna hang Bush with that sack of crap charge.

Steve Thomas wrote:
On May 20, 11:31 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
Treason. War Crimes. Violating his oath of office.
"Steve Thomas" wrote

And the evidence is?
War,

Legal war.



NO CONTROLLING AUTHORITY.

"Poetic Justice" wrote
NO CONTROLLING AUTHORITY.

No declaration of war.
Violation of U.N. charter.

Execute the Traitor in the White House.