More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

On Nov 22, 5:43*pm, JohnM wrote:
More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

Rubbish. They show the "scientists" colluding to modify and inflate
temperatures to support their failling conjecture

You cannot refute the damning emails.
Like all deranged trolls, you snip the OP and post something irrelevent.

Try again, you stupid ****:

A partial review of the emails shows that in many cases, climate scientists revealed that their own
research wasn't always conclusive. In others, they discussed ways to paper over differences among
themselves in order to present a "unified" view on climate change. On at least one occasion,
climate scientists were asked to "beef up" conclusions about climate change and extreme weather
events because environmental officials in one country were planning a "big public splash."

The release of the documents has given ammunition to many skeptics of man-made global warming, who
for years have argued that the scientific "consensus" was less robust than the official IPCC
summaries indicated and that climate researchers systematically ostracized other scientists who
presented findings that differed from orthodox views.

"JohnM" wrote in message
...
More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

On Nov 22, 7:36*pm, "Eric Gisin" wrote:
You cannot refute the damning emails.

Which email is damning, pray? They do nothing but show the scientists
concerned were at worst being human. Post one, just one, that shows
evidence of a world-wide conspiracy to defraud the global population
of taxpayer money and I'll join you in your crusade.

Like all deranged trolls, you snip the OP and post something irrelevent.

Try again, you stupid ****:

Sure. Your wish is my command.

snip of redundant post that anyone can read upthread

"JohnM" wrote in message

...
More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

chemist wrote:
On Nov 22, 5:43 pm, wrote:
More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

Rubbish. They show the "scientists" colluding to modify and inflate
temperatures to support their failling conjecture

But, this does not perse falsify the results. Has that thought already
occurred to you?

Q

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:43:07 -0800 (PST), JohnM
wrote:

More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/


What climate science?

On Nov 22, 10:46*pm, "I M @ good guy" wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:43:07 -0800 (PST), JohnM

wrote:
More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the
MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/
communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down
to the hackers also being in on the plot though.

http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/11/21/the-cru-hack/

* * * * What climate science?

Sorry. I only reply to posts in English.

"JohnM" wrote in message
news:6f2eda0d-b25a-4abf-82fd-

And, MORE important the emails show that every effort here is not about
the
science, but about policy, the public impression and do EVERYTHING
POSSIBLE
to KEEP the GRAVY TRAIN of grant and research money flowing.

It you don't think that ignoring anything that hurts your cause, and using
ANY thing that SUPPORTS your cause is not corrupted science, then I can
really can't help you. It is exactly YOUR kind of mentality that gives us
the banking scandals, the Enron's, and now this rotten to the core
behaviors
by climate scientists...

Yet another pillock that hasn't read a single one of the emails.

You really need to clean your glasses. I quoted direct from those emails in
that post of mine...

I don't really understand you. You seem to be taking the same corrupt point
of view that these people have. Why do you spin and put words into my mouth?

Seems birds of feather really do flock together when it comes to this issue.

I have quoted SEVERAL time here, I seek the truth...nothing but the truth
here.

I really can't imagine you standing here and think this type of behaviors by
these scientists is just fine and dandy and does not WARRANT A SEROUS CHANGE
in how this peer process works, of which clearly there is none!

I can ONLY think you really don't care about truth and science, do you? That
what makes our side differnt then your side....

What part of the email quote I used did you fail to read?

Super Turtle

On Nov 23, 11:55 am, "Green Turtle"
wrote:

You really need to clean your glasses. I quoted direct from those emails in
that post of mine...

I don't really understand you. You seem to be taking the same corrupt point
of view that these people have. Why do you spin and put words into my mouth?

Seems birds of feather really do flock together when it comes to this issue.

I have quoted SEVERAL time here, I seek the truth...nothing but the truth
here.

I really can't imagine you standing here and think this type of behaviors by
these scientists is just fine and dandy and does not WARRANT A SEROUS CHANGE
in how this peer process works, of which clearly there is none!

I can ONLY think you really don't care about truth and science, do you? That
what makes our side differnt then your side....

What part of the email quote I used did you fail to read?

johnm is the poster I'd expect to the Global Warming gravy train to
launch to reduce the damage they're at present suffering.
And might I add the excerpts you posted don't show the collusion of
the 179 'scientists' and others in presenting a united front.

On Nov 22, 12:43*pm, JohnM wrote:

More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. [NOT]

You can't keep changing the subject forever, moron.