http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4210629.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4210629.stm

This article is DIRTY. It stinks of CRAPITALISM, and I do SINCERELY
hope that this is never translated into ANY living Slavic language.:-(

I WILL NOT TOLERATE THE "WARMING" OF LENIN'S EARTH!!!

:-(

Remember, just 20 years ago we were talking about a new ICE AGE - JUST
AS WE WERE LAST YEAR!!! See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3266833.stm

D.

Alan wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4210629.stm


Apart from photosynthesis, is there no way of breaking down CO2 into C
and O2?
I don't suppose that using the increased amount of water from rising sea
levels (minus the salt) to irrigate the Sahara and plant an additional
forest there is a viable option.

--
Gianna Stefani

www.buchan-meteo.org.uk

On 26 Jan 2005 13:14:22 -0800, "Damien" wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4210629.stm

This article is DIRTY. It stinks of CRAPITALISM, and I do SINCERELY
hope that this is never translated into ANY living Slavic language.:-(

I WILL NOT TOLERATE THE "WARMING" OF LENIN'S EARTH!!!

:-(

Remember, just 20 years ago we were talking about a new ICE AGE - JUST
AS WE WERE LAST YEAR!!! See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3266833.stm

D.

Finally had enough of this idiot. Into the killfile he goes.

!plonk!

Finally had enough of this idiot. Into the killfile he goes.

Oh now, come on!

Just what EXACTLY was "WRONG" with my particular post above?!

Besides, I don't go around "killfiling" YOU, do I?:-( :-( :-(
Piece of poo.

You ASKED for that slur, mate!

:-(

D.

By the way, thank for most SUCCESSFULLY DERAILING this thread, with
your blatant and indeed most inane anti-communist rhetoric!:-(

D.

JPG wrote in news:mu3gv0d1mocbodl3rfb4aa2l8tjpoivfh0@
4ax.com:

Finally had enough of this idiot. Into the killfile he goes.

!plonk!

I've noticed we've become a lot of plonkers on here in the last week or
so...

Richard

Apart from photosynthesis, is there no way of breaking down CO2 into C and
O2?
I don't suppose that using the increased amount of water from rising sea
levels (minus the salt) to irrigate the Sahara and plant an additional
forest there is a viable option.

--
Gianna Stefani

The biggest 'biomass' (and the one we know least about) that takes CO2 out
of the atmosphere is the plankton. Dead plankton sinks to the seabed and is
incorporated into sedimentary carbonate rocks (shales, limestones & chalk
etc.). Not sure how the CO2 uptake per square Km compares to the forested
areas of the globe - but the ocean is indeed a huge surface area and
effectivley a CO2 sponge- locking away CO2 in rock form for milenia. Carbon
in 'forest' form might be re-released as CO2 in a few short months by forest
fires, natural decay etc. What we really need is a 'Super Plankton Bloom' to
suck out all that nasty CO2!! The geological past proof of such activity is
the chalk and limestone layers which are hundreds of feet thick. Coal layers
from past forests (though much compressed) are rarely more than a few tens
of feet thick. It's highly probable that extra CO2 in the atmosphere may
largely be absorbed by the oceans.

Nevillef

"Alan" wrote in message

did you not mean ..."More *Interesting* news on climate change"... !

Like most people on this group I find bizarre, violent and unpredictable
weather utterly fascinating, so presumably global warming to the tune of
11°C will bring on a very very interesting future!

Stuart wrote:
"Alan" wrote in message

did you not mean ..."More *Interesting* news on climate change"... !

Like most people on this group I find bizarre, violent and unpredictable
weather utterly fascinating, so presumably global warming to the tune of
11°C will bring on a very very interesting future!


So interesting that you won't be alive to see it (-:


--
Gianna Stefani

www.buchan-meteo.org.uk