****head is back i see

Mumford I would like to email you something, is your email valid?





"mumford" wrote in message
...
****head is back i see

"mumford" wrote in message
...
****head is back i see

Hello Terry

After the kicking Dullish took on here recently I really diid feel sorry for
him so I sent him this email

"Paul

I see you are absent after taking a barrage of criticism and whether you
mean to or not you come across as abrasively , dismissive of most people who
disagree with you. I initially found some of your put downs hurtful and
unnecessary they also made my blood boil.

You have built up a body of intolerance and even hostility towards yourself
and I for one feel you've without a shadow of a doubt have brought that on
yourself, however I don't like to see what's happened recently and although
you had it coming it wasn't nice and I may be wrong, but I suspect you are
feeling a little down at the moment. I suspected this and seeing that you
haven't posted since yesterday I believe it to be true but hey I'm probably
a mile of target.

Even though your manner -not views- used get on me tits, its definitely
getting on some of the others. I feel no animosity towards you but its not
the bridges with me that you see as important."


I thought it was fair comment and trying to be nice at the same time.
However he then sent me this, yesterday.

"Basically whatever.

You have little brain and very little interest for me and really don't care
a hoot for the opinion of a far right wing climate denier and serial idiot
like yourself.

It is your right to believe and think what you will. It is my right to
completely ignore you when I wish. No-one with any sense listens to a word
you say and I find this email offensive and your calling me names, swearing
at me and being downright foul on that newsgroup offensive too.

I may however, correct your stupid scientific views, should I feel like it,
as they have no basis in reality whatsoever.

I side with Jim. He loves you, doesn't he? And he's not the only one who
can't stand your fascist, completely unscientific views. Your reply is
blocked as junk and will be immediately deleted so any bile will go
unregistered, Loo Roll. Really; your opinion is worthless, you've always
degenerated into foul-mouthed insults whenever you've been challenged in the
past and you'll now revert to type - hence the block on any more emails.

Goodbye. "


Charming eh? The mans a see you next tuesday and I will now take the ****
until hell freezes over although according to Joe B that could be soon,

Seriously though the man is vile and deserves no mercy .

"mumford" wrote in message
...
****head is back i see


Oops

Just sent a message that should have been private sorry all its to late now.
I 've tried to cancel it . Sorry.

On 10 Oct, 16:31, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"mumford" wrote in message

...

****head is back i see

Oops

Just sent a message that should have been private sorry all its to late now.
I 've tried to cancel it . Sorry.

I wouldn't bother to apologise - it was a great laugh! Kick the lefty
in the nuts, serves him right, the mealy mouthed bugger would just as
soon "red button" all of us, er, "deniers" if he could.

CK

On Oct 10, 3:31*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:
"mumford" wrote in message

...

****head is back i see

Oops

Just sent a message that should have been private sorry all its to late now.
I 've tried to cancel it . Sorry.

As I said, you really are stupid, and that's how you are viewed,
though this was deliberate. I thought you might do this kind of thing,
so I was very careful what I said, but it means no-one could trust
you. Emails are private, but not to you and if you sent a reply, it
really is blocked. Siding with stalkers and the french fascist is not
the best of company, but you really are a fascist and your so-called
"science" is ridiculous.

I have a whole host of emails stored - from you and other so-called
"reasonable" posters. I've always refrained from posting them loo
roll, as it paints you and others in a dreadful light and far worse
than *anything* I've ever said.

First and last response you'll get from me on this one, though like
others of your foul kind, you won't be able to resist a reply.
However, you'll be viewed as something unrepeatable, for breaching
trust, by any reasonable person. Not that it will matter to someone
like you.

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
eb.com...

"mumford" wrote in message
...
****head is back i see

Hello Terry

After the kicking Dullish took on here recently I really diid feel sorry
for him so I sent him this email

"Paul

I see you are absent after taking a barrage of criticism and whether you
mean to or not you come across as abrasively , dismissive of most people
who
disagree with you. I initially found some of your put downs hurtful and
unnecessary they also made my blood boil.

You have built up a body of intolerance and even hostility towards
yourself
and I for one feel you've without a shadow of a doubt have brought that on
yourself, however I don't like to see what's happened recently and
although
you had it coming it wasn't nice and I may be wrong, but I suspect you are
feeling a little down at the moment. I suspected this and seeing that you
haven't posted since yesterday I believe it to be true but hey I'm
probably
a mile of target.

Even though your manner -not views- used get on me tits, its definitely
getting on some of the others. I feel no animosity towards you but its not
the bridges with me that you see as important."


I thought it was fair comment and trying to be nice at the same time.
However he then sent me this, yesterday.

"Basically whatever.

You have little brain and very little interest for me and really don't
care a hoot for the opinion of a far right wing climate denier and serial
idiot like yourself.

It is your right to believe and think what you will. It is my right to
completely ignore you when I wish. No-one with any sense listens to a word
you say and I find this email offensive and your calling me names,
swearing at me and being downright foul on that newsgroup offensive too.

I may however, correct your stupid scientific views, should I feel like
it, as they have no basis in reality whatsoever.

I side with Jim. He loves you, doesn't he? And he's not the only one who
can't stand your fascist, completely unscientific views. Your reply is
blocked as junk and will be immediately deleted so any bile will go
unregistered, Loo Roll. Really; your opinion is worthless, you've always
degenerated into foul-mouthed insults whenever you've been challenged in
the past and you'll now revert to type - hence the block on any more
emails.

Goodbye. "


Charming eh? The mans a see you next tuesday and I will now take the ****
until hell freezes over although according to Joe B that could be soon,

Seriously though the man is vile and deserves no mercy .


Well at least it's all out in the open now and we can seen the true colour
of everybody's cloth!
Why are people so nasty nowadays, I'm sure it never used to be like this on
here?

Will
--

as a long time lurker in this group, I really can't belive how juvenile
people can be. Grow up, get a life etc. Now can we go back to the weather
.....

On Oct 10, 6:10*pm, "Will Hand" wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message

eb.com...







"mumford" wrote in message
...
****head is back i see

Hello Terry

After the kicking Dullish took on here recently I really diid feel sorry
for him so I sent him this email

"Paul

I see you are absent after taking a barrage of criticism and whether you
mean to or not you come across as abrasively , dismissive of most people
who
disagree with you. I initially *found some of your put downs hurtful and
unnecessary they also made my blood boil.

You have built up a body of intolerance and even hostility towards
yourself
and I for one feel you've without a shadow of a doubt have brought that on
yourself, however I don't like to see what's happened recently and
although
you had it coming it wasn't nice and I may be wrong, but I suspect you are
feeling a little down at the moment. I suspected this and seeing that you
haven't posted since yesterday I believe it to be true but hey I'm
probably
a mile of target.

Even though your manner *-not views- used get on me tits, its *definitely
getting on some of the others. I feel no animosity towards you but its not
the bridges with me that you see as important."

I thought it was fair comment and trying to be nice at the same time.
However he then sent me this, yesterday.

"Basically whatever.

You have little brain and very little interest for me and really don't
care a hoot for the opinion of a far right wing climate denier and serial
idiot like yourself.

It is your right to believe and think what you will. It is my right to
completely ignore you when I wish. No-one with any sense listens to a word
you say and I find this email offensive and your calling me names,
swearing at me and being downright foul on that newsgroup offensive too..

I may however, correct your stupid scientific views, should I feel like
it, as they have no basis in reality whatsoever.

I side with Jim. He loves you, doesn't he? And he's not the only one who
can't stand your fascist, completely unscientific views. Your reply is
blocked as junk and will be immediately deleted so any bile will go
unregistered, Loo Roll. Really; your opinion is worthless, you've always
degenerated into foul-mouthed insults whenever you've been challenged in
the past and you'll now revert to type - hence the block on any more
emails.

Goodbye. "

Charming eh? The mans a see you next tuesday and I will now take the ****
until hell freezes over although according to Joe B that could be soon,

Seriously though the man is vile and deserves no mercy .

Well at least it's all out in the open now and we can seen the true colour
of everybody's cloth!
Why are people so nasty nowadays, I'm sure it never used to be like this on
here?

Will
--- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You know perfectly well it never used to be like this until
Dawlish arrived. I know it and everybody who has been here a number of
years knows it. Does Dawlish know it? Probably, but he's too self-
important to be put off by such a trifling consideration. He is,
after all, Master of the Occasional Forecast and has a Diploma in
Pompous Waffle. Unfortunately, he's a ratbag.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On 10 Oct, 18:53, Ian Sutherland
wrote:
as a long time lurker in this group, I really can't belive how juvenile
people can be. *Grow up, get a life etc. *Now can we go back to the weather
....

Well said Ian.

I think that 'cyber-bullying' is the modern phrase to describe what
generally goes on here.

As with all bullying, the perpetrators will be the first to throw up
their hands in horror and plead innocence, but I think that anyone
with an unbiased view of the rights of everyone to hold a particular
viewpoint will shudder at how folk who openly admit to being over 60
years old can behave in this manner.

If this was an ng for the under 20s then while the bullying behaviour
would still be abhorrent, at least some leeway might be given for
youthful ignorance.

I presume that the same psychology is used on here as is portrayed by
certain drivers of motor vehicles, i.e. the perceived anonymity gives
certain people the feeling that they can get away with any behaviour
they like.