On Monday, 27 May 2013 16:42:04 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:
On 27/05/2013 10:21, Adam Lea wrote:

On 27/05/13 07:36, Vidcapper wrote:

On 26/05/2013 15:54, Desperate Dan wrote:





You're a strange lot you English. You look down on everyone who isn't

English and hate the Germans.

An anti immigration view is endemic



Having some of them start chopping up British soldiers in the streets is

supposed to *endear* them to us?



Ah yes, the "them and us" mentality again. People are individuals, just

because someone does an act of atrocity supposedly in the name of some

religion does not mean everyone following that religion is going to

start chopping people up. This sort of tribal mentality really holds us

back as a species.





and now you have the nutters in UKIP as well as the Conservative

party to voice your narrow opinions.



All opinions are valid.





No they're not.



Excuse me?!



Whether you personally agree with someone's opinion is one thing, but

that doesn't alter the fact that everyone is entitled to belive what

they like!



--

Regards,



Paul Hyett


Take no notice of Adam as he's a eco fascist

Did yus knows zat ze Fuhrer was a lovely danzer and a vegitaryan?

On Monday, May 27, 2013 4:53:22 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 16:42:04 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:

On 27/05/2013 10:21, Adam Lea wrote:



On 27/05/13 07:36, Vidcapper wrote:



On 26/05/2013 15:54, Desperate Dan wrote:











You're a strange lot you English. You look down on everyone who isn't



English and hate the Germans.



An anti immigration view is endemic







Having some of them start chopping up British soldiers in the streets is



supposed to *endear* them to us?







Ah yes, the "them and us" mentality again. People are individuals, just



because someone does an act of atrocity supposedly in the name of some



religion does not mean everyone following that religion is going to



start chopping people up. This sort of tribal mentality really holds us



back as a species.











and now you have the nutters in UKIP as well as the Conservative



party to voice your narrow opinions.







All opinions are valid.











No they're not.







Excuse me?!







Whether you personally agree with someone's opinion is one thing, but



that doesn't alter the fact that everyone is entitled to belive what



they like!







--



Regards,







Paul Hyett





Take no notice of Adam as he's a eco fascist



Did yus knows zat ze Fuhrer was a lovely danzer and a vegitaryan?

Take no notice of Lawrence, because he is a fascist.

On Monday, May 27, 2013 6:03:28 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

Take no notice of Lawrence, because he is a fascist.

And a hypocrite of the highest (or is it lowest?) order

On Sunday, 26 May 2013 06:41:29 UTC+12, Graham P Davis wrote:
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks.

The met. agency here uses essentially a similar kind of "relativistic" scale in the descriptive part of its temperature forecasting. The MetService website report on current conditions in the towns covered cites actual temperature, "feels like" temperature, and a clothing layers suggestion. I think that's fairly useful. But no system can ever hope to make sense to all, given the large range of human physiological responses possible, IMO.

For me "showers" occur in situations where there is (a) intermittency - gaps between rainfalls, as well as variations in the cloud cover or cloud thickness;

(b) Some convective activity. A rather marginal case here would be if a cold southerly airflow is delivering mainly overcast skies with fairly limited convective activity and "passing showers" with not much lightening of the skies during the breaks.

If I can figure out from local knowledge plus forecast when it will/won't rain, (and an idea of intensity of any rain) as well as when any sunny part of the day is expected, I'm happy to ignore any deficiencies in the forecasting accuracy.

On Monday, 27 May 2013 18:03:28 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 4:53:22 PM UTC+1, Lawrence13 wrote:

On Monday, 27 May 2013 16:42:04 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:



On 27/05/2013 10:21, Adam Lea wrote:







On 27/05/13 07:36, Vidcapper wrote:







On 26/05/2013 15:54, Desperate Dan wrote:























You're a strange lot you English. You look down on everyone who isn't







English and hate the Germans.







An anti immigration view is endemic















Having some of them start chopping up British soldiers in the streets is







supposed to *endear* them to us?















Ah yes, the "them and us" mentality again. People are individuals, just







because someone does an act of atrocity supposedly in the name of some







religion does not mean everyone following that religion is going to







start chopping people up. This sort of tribal mentality really holds us







back as a species.























and now you have the nutters in UKIP as well as the Conservative







party to voice your narrow opinions.















All opinions are valid.























No they're not.















Excuse me?!















Whether you personally agree with someone's opinion is one thing, but







that doesn't alter the fact that everyone is entitled to belive what







they like!















--







Regards,















Paul Hyett











Take no notice of Adam as he's a eco fascist







Did yus knows zat ze Fuhrer was a lovely danzer and a vegitaryan?



Take no notice of Lawrence, because he is a fascist.

What's your politics comrade. Yes other peoples lives , suit you sir.

On Monday, 27 May 2013 18:07:55 UTC+1, Big Bollox *******i wrote:
On Monday, May 27, 2013 6:03:28 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:



Take no notice of Lawrence, because he is a fascist.



And a hypocrite of the highest (or is it lowest?) order

You are a fraud and a liar and -how dare you, yes you; take in vain the name of the greatest forecaster in the world.

On Friday, 24 May 2013 11:29:58 UTC+1, ron button wrote:
Obviously this is not a question for the very hardy (or whatever description

you can think of) like Norman or Philip Eden or several other lurkers on

this group, but when does 'cool' become 'cold ',fresher become bleeding

freezing,and 'changeable' become downright 'orrible ?.

All these terms are freely babbled out by the army of 'forecasters' we are

blessed with on TV and radio presumably at the behest of the Exeter gurus

who decide what is relevant or not depending on the current fashion,like at

the moment letting presenters put their own personal opinions instead of

historical facts

Yes. it probably is me .....



RonB

Depends who's sponsoring the weather forecast. On the independent channels backers like Powergen are going the say colder rather than cooler as they want to imbue a sense of the need to keep warm and use more energy. With the Meto and via the BBC, they are sponsored by AGW and always exaggerate to instil the feeling that the planet is warming uncontrollably.

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...

Take no notice of Lawrence, because he is a fascist.

You're a fascist, no *you're* a fascist!

This is the kind of thread Godwin's law was invented for.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On 27/05/2013 16:53, Lawrence13 wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 16:42:04 UTC+1, vidcapper wrote:


All opinions are valid.


No they're not.


Excuse me?!


Whether you personally agree with someone's opinion is one thing, but
that doesn't alter the fact that everyone is entitled to belive what
they like!

Take no notice of Adam as he's a eco fascist

That's a new one on me?

--
Regards,

Paul Hyett

"Vidcapper" wrote in message
...

Take no notice of Adam as he's a eco fascist

That's a new one on me?

--
Regards,

Paul Hyett

Paul,

Ecofascist has been around for a while but your reply has stimulated me into
finding out what it means. There is an entry in Wikipedia for Ecofascism so
it must have arrived!

There are two entries in the Urban Dictionary:
One for "eco-fascist"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...rm=eco-fascist
A person who uses the unsubstantiated beliefs and sentiments of
environmentalism to impose their political will onto the scientifically
illiterate public to inflate their megalomanic sense of power. Usually at
the public's detriment.
....
Al Gore is one of the most notable and dogmatic eco-fascists for preaching
his prophecy of "Truth" for his own self-agrandizement and his obvious
agenda of demonizing the oil barons that defeated his political aspirations
to the US Presidency, which he clearly felt entitled to.

and another for "ecofascist"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...erm=ecofascist
The belief that the life of a wombat or a mosquito is more valuable than
that of a human, and the willingness to hold a gun to the head of anyone who
disagrees.

I think that either definition would make the term off topic for this
newsgroup :-)

Cheers, Alastair.