On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:11:59 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers
after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied
to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

As I have your attention, Jim, please could you ask Piers what went
wrong with this piece of his forecasting, issued on December 9th 2014:

"The massive storm (map below for 10th 12noon) now heading for Britain
and Ireland 9/10th bringing blizzard conditions for most parts and
damaging gales or storms in all parts is essentially our top active
period 5-8th extended a day or two.
"This will then develop to set up the more Northerly VERY SEVERE
SNOW AND BLIZZARD BLAST WITH EXTREME COLD AND GALES for the following
period Friday 12th to Tue 16th . This was always forecast by
WeatherAction (from 100days ahead with detail 27days ahead) to be more
extreme and severe then 5-8th and that looks like what is going to hit.
"This will probably be the most extreme 5 days of snow blizzards and
and gales in Britain and Ireland for 100 years, being more severe than
the worst events of December 2010 (which were also correctly forecast by
WeatherAction)."

Over to you, Jim Cannon.

Are you a subscriber Malcolm? If so, and you are not 100% HAPPY with the service, you have the right to return your subscription. On the EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take action. At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced rate in view of any snow disappointment.
Which is MORE than you can say for the Met Office! Every time they get a forecast wrong we dont get tax rebates do we! The amount of times theyve dropped a clanger I think wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

In message , Jim
Cannon writes
On the EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take
action. At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced
rate in view of any snow disappointment. Which is MORE than you can say
for the Met Office! Every time they get a forecast wrong we dont get
tax rebates do we! The amount of times theyve dropped a clanger I think
wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

What's the MO's annual budget? A couple of hundred million a year? That
would work out at something like £3 per person per year, maybe £5 if you
only include taxpayers. Looks like pretty good value to me. It's a
fraction of what Piers charges.
--
I'm not paid to implement the recognition of irony.
(Taken, with the author's permission, from a LiveJournal post)

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 5:12:10 PM UTC, John Hall wrote:
In message , Jim
Cannon writes
On the EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take
action. At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced
rate in view of any snow disappointment. Which is MORE than you can say
for the Met Office! Every time they get a forecast wrong we dont get
tax rebates do we! The amount of times theyve dropped a clanger I think
wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

What's the MO's annual budget? A couple of hundred million a year? That
would work out at something like £3 per person per year, maybe £5 if you
only include taxpayers. Looks like pretty good value to me. It's a
fraction of what Piers charges.
--
Yes but people have a choice of whether they want to subscribe to Sir Piers.. The Met Office is just foisted on people / the ones who pay tax that is

On 10/02/2015 19:10, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 5:12:10 PM UTC, John Hall wrote:
In message , Jim
Cannon writes

On the EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take
action. At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced
rate in view of any snow disappointment. Which is MORE than you can say
for the Met Office! Every time they get a forecast wrong we dont get
tax rebates do we! The amount of times theyve dropped a clanger I think
wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

What's the MO's annual budget? A couple of hundred million a year? That
would work out at something like £3 per person per year, maybe £5 if you
only include taxpayers. Looks like pretty good value to me. It's a
fraction of what Piers charges.

Yes but people have a choice of whether they want to subscribe to Sir Piers. The Met Office is just foisted on people / the ones who pay tax that is

Fools and their money being easily parted by the Grand Charlatan and his
illiterate incompetent halfwitted PR guru Loose Cannon.

Only a complete idiot would pay good money for the garbage he spouts.

Rain or go dark before morning conveys no useful information!

The only people who benefit are lazy redtop editors looking for a shock
horror panic weather scare story on a slack news day. Very convenient
how the Grand Charlatan manages to forget all his incorrect forecasts.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:35:31 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:11:59 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers
after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied
to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

As I have your attention, Jim, please could you ask Piers what went
wrong with this piece of his forecasting, issued on December 9th 2014:

"The massive storm (map below for 10th 12noon) now heading for Britain
and Ireland 9/10th bringing blizzard conditions for most parts and
damaging gales or storms in all parts is essentially our top active
period 5-8th extended a day or two.
"This will then develop to set up the more Northerly VERY SEVERE
SNOW AND BLIZZARD BLAST WITH EXTREME COLD AND GALES for the following
period Friday 12th to Tue 16th . This was always forecast by
WeatherAction (from 100days ahead with detail 27days ahead) to be more
extreme and severe then 5-8th and that looks like what is going to hit.
"This will probably be the most extreme 5 days of snow blizzards and
and gales in Britain and Ireland for 100 years, being more severe than
the worst events of December 2010 (which were also correctly forecast by
WeatherAction)."

Over to you, Jim Cannon.

Are you a subscriber Malcolm? If so, and you are not 100% HAPPY with
the service, you have the right to return your subscription. On the
EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take action.
At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced rate in
view of any snow disappointment.
Which is MORE than you can say for the Met Office! Every time they get
a forecast wrong we dont get tax rebates do we! The amount of times
theyve dropped a clanger I think wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

Dear Jim

I asked you a question and you did what everyone does when asked a
question they can't answer, you asked a question of me and then tried
diversionary tactics. I wasn't asking about the Met Office's forecasts,
I was asking about this particular forecast of Corbyn who repeatedly
claims how much better he is than the Met Office.

Now, would you please re-read my question and answer it. I want to know
what went wrong with that forecast posted here by you and repeating
Corbyn's very definite forecast. It didn't contain any "ifs" or "buts",
but instead clear statements of what was going to happen, including on
the very next day, which almost anyone is capable of forecasting, even
me. But not apparently Corbyn.

So, what went wrong?

--
Malcolm

Waiting........... and laughing at piers' inability to cope with this simple question

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:40:14 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 7:35:31 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:11:59 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers
after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied
to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

As I have your attention, Jim, please could you ask Piers what went
wrong with this piece of his forecasting, issued on December 9th 2014:

"The massive storm (map below for 10th 12noon) now heading for Britain
and Ireland 9/10th bringing blizzard conditions for most parts and
damaging gales or storms in all parts is essentially our top active
period 5-8th extended a day or two.
"This will then develop to set up the more Northerly VERY SEVERE
SNOW AND BLIZZARD BLAST WITH EXTREME COLD AND GALES for the following
period Friday 12th to Tue 16th . This was always forecast by
WeatherAction (from 100days ahead with detail 27days ahead) to be more
extreme and severe then 5-8th and that looks like what is going to hit.
"This will probably be the most extreme 5 days of snow blizzards and
and gales in Britain and Ireland for 100 years, being more severe than
the worst events of December 2010 (which were also correctly forecast by
WeatherAction)."

Over to you, Jim Cannon.

Are you a subscriber Malcolm? If so, and you are not 100% HAPPY with
the service, you have the right to return your subscription. On the
EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take action..
At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced rate in
view of any snow disappointment.
Which is MORE than you can say for the Met Office! Every time they get
a forecast wrong we dont get tax rebates do we! The amount of times
theyve dropped a clanger I think wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!

Dear Jim

I asked you a question and you did what everyone does when asked a
question they can't answer, you asked a question of me and then tried
diversionary tactics. I wasn't asking about the Met Office's forecasts,
I was asking about this particular forecast of Corbyn who repeatedly
claims how much better he is than the Met Office.

Now, would you please re-read my question and answer it. I want to know
what went wrong with that forecast posted here by you and repeating
Corbyn's very definite forecast. It didn't contain any "ifs" or "buts",
but instead clear statements of what was going to happen, including on
the very next day, which almost anyone is capable of forecasting, even
me. But not apparently Corbyn.

So, what went wrong?

--
Malcolm

Waiting........... and laughing at piers' inability to cope with this simple question

Its above my pay grade lads but heres one possible explanation:

"a massive dark solar filament is on the earth facing portion of the sun ===http://ow.ly/IOChZ ===. This filament is "a tendril of plasma more than 1,000,000 km long held suspended above the surface of the sun by **magnetic forces**" [SpaceWeather 9 Feb 15]. It stretches from one side of suns southern hemisphere to the other. If youve been around here for some time then you will notice these dark solar filaments have put out previous cold forecasts in years gone by. Now why should it affect the forecast? Well Sir Piers theory is based upon the earth-solar (lunar modulated) MAGNETIC CONNECTION which affects circulation patterns/jetstream. This will affect the connection. This image gives a very good representation of magnetic field lines around the filament === http://ow.ly/IOATi === Ive been watching it since 3rd Feb (it has trebled in size since then) but how/if this has an impact on fcasts+going forward?

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 9:00:38 PM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:


still waiting.......... and still laughing heartily now

On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared.

There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion.

Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0

Reality check, score at full-time

Piers 0 v Planet Earth 1,000,000

On 08/02/2015 22:42, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 10:26:25 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes

I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with
our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes,
but didnt get a chance.

HATTRICK!!!

Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0

So, if one wants to ask a question but doesn't get a chance, that counts
as a win. How very revealing of Mr Corbyn's methods.

In my book that counts as a WIN!!!. The society should make enought TIME for questions. They didnt and never do cos theyre TERRIFIED people are going to question there global warning dogma. The pubic are waking up to this FACT!!!!!!!

Do you always type in "tabloid headlines"?

On 09/02/2015 20:32, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

Can you please leave out the commercials?