On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:30:50 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

I will never understand you. However I do understand the psychology behind your posts, just not the reason that prompts you to do so.

And if you bothered to read my posts you will have noted that I have agreed with you about Lawrence, not completely, but partially. Some of his posting is on the limits of absurdity, however, after reading his comments for many, many years on here, what he does have is an irony and sense of humour that you just don't get.

It's so ironic that you should be questioning a question, as answering them is something that you have consistently failed to achieve. And as someone involved in education, the fact that you are are questioning this right makes me worry for the standards we are setting.

"Bruce Messer" wrote in message
...
I for one would agree with Tudor wholeheartedly.

You just quote from some expert or web site and call anyone who disagrees
with you an idiot, which not infurriates me but everyone else who reads this
news group. I can see why you behave as you do because its the way you
behave and survive on the global warming group which is very hostile. If you
just toned it down a bit like you do when you aren't talking with your
global warming hat on you might win a few people over. The climate will keep
on changing no matter what we do or how nasty we are with each other.
=============

I presume you are talking about dawlish? :-)
No Brucie bonus for you then :-)

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:02:16 AM UTC+3, Bruce Messer wrote:
I for one would agree with Tudor wholeheartedly.

You just quote from some expert or web site and call anyone who disagrees with you an idiot, which not infurriates me but everyone else who reads this news group. I can see why you behave as you do because its the way you behave and survive on the global warming group which is very hostile. If you just toned it down a bit like you do when you aren't talking with your global warming hat on you might win a few people over. The climate will keep on changing no matter what we do or how nasty we are with each other.

'Behaved'. I'll post exactly the way I wish, Bruce, but thank you for your concern.

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:19:45 AM UTC+3, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:30:50 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

I will never understand you.

I know. It shows in your every post and I can assure you that it is not my fault.

However I do understand the psychology behind your posts....

Hilarious. Stick with your first comment as you have no idea, because you simply don't understand (or like) me. *))

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:59:23 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:19:45 AM UTC+3, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:30:50 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

I will never understand you.

I know. It shows in your every post and I can assure you that it is not my fault.

However I do understand the psychology behind your posts....

Hilarious. Stick with your first comment as you have no idea, because you simply don't understand (or like) me. *))

It never is your fault. You are never wrong. You never answer a question. Get back to your Peter Pan existence in Neverland. Fool.

On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 11:58:49 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:02:16 AM UTC+3, Bruce Messer wrote:
I for one would agree with Tudor wholeheartedly.

You just quote from some expert or web site and call anyone who disagrees with you an idiot, which not infurriates me but everyone else who reads this news group. I can see why you behave as you do because its the way you behave and survive on the global warming group which is very hostile. If you just toned it down a bit like you do when you aren't talking with your global warming hat on you might win a few people over. The climate will keep on changing no matter what we do or how nasty we are with each other.

'Behaved'. I'll post exactly the way I wish, Bruce, but thank you for your concern.

That's the problem. Not the content but the style. "It ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it" etc etc. I reckon I could talk Lawrie round to a more rational view of AGW given a couple of pints of Triple X Old Fart, and he wouldn't be in the least offended, but no-one is going to give an inch if they're hectored, shown contempt and called an idiot.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 2:49:25 PM UTC+3, David Mitchell wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:59:23 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:19:45 AM UTC+3, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 1:30:50 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
You understand me full well, but admitting I'm completely correct about larry is so far beyond you, it could be on the moon.

I will never understand you.

I know. It shows in your every post and I can assure you that it is not my fault.

However I do understand the psychology behind your posts....

Hilarious. Stick with your first comment as you have no idea, because you simply don't understand (or like) me. *))

It never is your fault.

In your opinion.

You are never wrong.

Thank you for saying that but as often, you are wrong. I am wrong on occasions and admit it happily when I am. Here I am not and you know that, but to admit that to the newsgroup would be as hurtful to you as cutting off a toe.

You never answer a question.

You do not read my posts carefully, which is why you think that.

Get back to your Peter Pan existence in Neverland. Fool.

You know when someone resorts to open abuse, they have lost any argument they were trying to put forward. I look forward with anticipation to your next interjection. I hope you have more success.

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 5:13:42 PM UTC+3, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 July 2015 11:58:49 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:02:16 AM UTC+3, Bruce Messer wrote:
I for one would agree with Tudor wholeheartedly.

You just quote from some expert or web site and call anyone who disagrees with you an idiot, which not infurriates me but everyone else who reads this news group. I can see why you behave as you do because its the way you behave and survive on the global warming group which is very hostile. If you just toned it down a bit like you do when you aren't talking with your global warming hat on you might win a few people over. The climate will keep on changing no matter what we do or how nasty we are with each other.

'Behaved'. I'll post exactly the way I wish, Bruce, but thank you for your concern.

That's the problem. Not the content

Thank you for acknowledging the correctness of the content. O appreciate that, even though you have been abusive and threatening towards me.

but the style. "It ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it" etc etc.

I'll post how I wish and not ask the permission of someone like you.

I reckon I could talk Lawrie round to a more rational view of AGW given a couple of pints of Triple X Old Fart, and he wouldn't be in the least offended, but no-one is going to give an inch if they're hectored, shown contempt and called an idiot.

I have no wish whatsoever to "talk larry round'. He is an idiot. Deniers are. They'll change their minds only when they want to, not when you get them ****ed and they won't tell anyone. They'll just quietly never mention the subject again. All that happens when larry gets ****ed is that he gets threatening and abusive - and not just with me.


Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Quote from Dawlish....

You know when someone resorts to open abuse, they have lost any argument they were trying to put forward.

And another....

I have no wish whatsoever to "talk larry round'. He is an idiot.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

--

Steve R.
Swansea

In article ,
says...
Apart from a disagreeable tendency to constantly label someone as an "idiot", I find Dawlish's posts amongst the most rational and sensible.

Is your name Warren?


Looks like Warmie to me.....

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.