Deviation from 81-10 baseline for Feb 2016 is +0.83C. Wonder if this will
need to be revised for some reason?

http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/

Will be interested to follow some of the comments on the blog, though it
will almost certainly get totally hijacked by the usual suspects standing on
their heads.

And I see the comments have already started including one from Roy Spencer
as a comment in his own blog:

'I don’t have a strong opinion on what will happen. If I had to, I’d guess
we will go back to a slow warming trend, even if we get a good La Nina in
the next couple years.

I’d love to see warming stop entirely, which is still a possibility…but I
wouldn’t bet on it. Easy for people to make long range predictions when no
one will remember how wrong you were.'

Interesting to see that even Spencer is warming to a 'slow warming trend'.

On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 19:21:15 UTC, JohnD wrote:
And I see the comments have already started including one from Roy Spencer
as a comment in his own blog:

'I don't have a strong opinion on what will happen. If I had to, I'd guess
we will go back to a slow warming trend, even if we get a good La Nina in
the next couple years.

I'd love to see warming stop entirely, which is still a possibility...but I
wouldn't bet on it. Easy for people to make long range predictions when no
one will remember how wrong you were.'

Interesting to see that even Spencer is warming to a 'slow warming trend'.

All cooling off now John.

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

All cooling off now John.

Really don't know what that comment might relate to - could be anything? If
you mean the UAH temperature series then for sure it will decline again at
some point soon, but possibly not for a month or two yet. And the upward
longer-term trend will continue regardless, as Roy Spencer now appears to
accept is inevitable.

"JohnD" wrote in message ...

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

All cooling off now John.

Any clues please as to what you meant?

On Thursday, 3 March 2016 08:42:51 UTC, JohnD wrote:
"JohnD" wrote in message ...

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

All cooling off now John.

Any clues please as to what you meant?

El Nino on the Wane and natural forcing saying things are going down. Hold on to your woolly hat and don't give away that balaclava

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

El Nino on the Wane and natural forcing saying things are going down.

But natural forcings aren't in charge any more. We are.

http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/20...ing-the-world/

Quite clear.

Larry now trying to say that 'natural forcings' (undefined, of course; he has no idea what these might be, but it's a good denier crock phrase that sounds as if it means something) are causing GW, not, of course, anthropogenic CO2. He's been reading Watts again.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

Maybe he should take note of what Spencer has been saying, but Spencer has been saying something he doesn't want to hear, so he doesn't listen to Spencer, either.

On Thursday, 3 March 2016 15:11:30 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Thursday, 3 March 2016 08:42:51 UTC, JohnD wrote:
"JohnD" wrote in message ...

"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...

All cooling off now John.

Any clues please as to what you meant?

El Nino on the Wane and natural forcing saying things are going down. Hold on to your woolly hat and don't give away that balaclava

Lawrence, If you mean Solar activity on the wane, a possibility of a La Nina later and with "favourable" changes in PDO and/or AMO, then I sure hope they're very significant impacts!

The current warming is undeniable, based on the scientific evidence, and them-that-know-more (than me!) suggest that apart from a possible temporary blip as a consequence of the above forcings, the warming will continue!

You might need that balaclava to keep the sun's rays off your face...!

JC