On Friday, 17 February 2017 04:24:17 UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 14:38:54 UTC, wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 February 2017 18:03:20 UTC, Col wrote:
On 15/02/2017 06:23, wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 23:21:26 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:

'dawlish'

Back on the obsession.

You are are just as obsessed as he is by commenting on it every time.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

And I always will. 😂😂😂 Every single time the idiot refers to me in a post.

Most of us rather like Weatherlawyer despite his various eccentricities, and tend to leave him alone. You failed to pick this up when you joined even when it was gently pointed out to you. It's obvious to most of us but too subtle for you. You just got him completely wrong and eventually he became uncharacteristically aggressive. You managed to bring out the worst in both him and many others, including me. I'd say you've got a social IQ of about -6 and will never achieve anything where you are on an equal footing with others.

Tudor Hughes

hughes tries again and now believes he's been elected group spokesman again.. You've tried that one before and been soundly put down for it haven't you?

ASs well as me, this provides entertainment for you and you will rise this morning, looking forward to the insults you can spray without admonishment.........well maybe. Do I have to remind the group of what you are really like again? w has a great deal in common with you in the foul-mouthed department, hasn't he?

In article ,
says...
Most of us rather like Weatherlawyer despite his various eccentricities, and tend to leave him alone. You failed to pick this up when you joined even when it was gently pointed out to you.


No, no, you've got it all wrong!. Paul outed him, and we should be
thankful to him because none of the rest of us had noticed that WL was
posting nonsense.


--
Alan LeHun

In article ,
says...
It's only happened because of an attack on me.


More alternative facts fron Paul G Trump. The attack was by silly old
you. On Will. 4th post.

Idiot!

--
Alan LeHun

In article ,
says...

?????


I told you to check how many posts you had made about yourself recently.
They were almost entirely in response to WL

Wonderful. Fly away now...


No. I don't think I will.


--
Alan LeHun

On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 3:30:26 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 1:34:09 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
Back on the obsession.

You are are just as obsessed as he is by commenting on it every time.


I've pointed that out to him already. He did his usual Trump thing,
ignoring the point completely, and carrying on as though no-one else
would have noticed.




--
Alan LeHun

You know that on Weather and Climate he wouldn't have the nerve to respond in this way, not after a yellow card from Bruce for his very first post.

Yes, this thread demonstrates the difference admirably. He only comes on USW now to insult people, as he can't get his fix on Weather & Climate. There he continues his 240 hour non forecast obsession, the main reason I give it a miss.

Graham
Penzance

On Monday, 13 February 2017 08:42:15 UTC, Crusader wrote:
Looking at the T+72 chart issued in the early hours of today and seeing the occluded front going apparently backwards across Scandinavia, makes me wonder how low the knowledge has to get before the MO do some decent training.

Add to that the incessant use of occluded fronts on the BBC forecast with the warm bumps and cold triangles drawn the wrong way around....I think that standards are definitely not important any more.

I wonder if these standards reflect the quality of other aspects, such as the observations and models as these new forecasters go up the chain over the past few years?
Certainly the apparent quality and accuracy of output that is given as public service forecasts has dropped significantly.

I fear for the future of MO forecasting.

It was possibly something to do with this one it has been erupting since then I think:
http://siberiantimes.com/other/other...-in-kamchatka/

On Friday, 17 February 2017 09:20:14 UTC, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 3:30:26 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 1:34:09 PM UTC+1, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article ,
says...
Back on the obsession.

You are are just as obsessed as he is by commenting on it every time.


I've pointed that out to him already. He did his usual Trump thing,
ignoring the point completely, and carrying on as though no-one else
would have noticed.




--
Alan LeHun

You know that on Weather and Climate he wouldn't have the nerve to respond in this way, not after a yellow card from Bruce for his very first post.

Yes, this thread demonstrates the difference admirably. He only comes on USW now to insult people, as he can't get his fix on Weather & Climate. There he continues his 240 hour non forecast obsession, the main reason I give it a miss.

Graham
Penzance

Oh! The vultures know me so well. I'm the only thing left in this newsgroup of interest, aren't I?

On Friday, 17 February 2017 16:28:35 UTC, wrote:
Oh! The vultures know me so well. I'm the only thing left in this newsgroup of interest, aren't I?

No, there are many useful reports and summaries of local weather in this group. You're just an irritant.

wrote in message
...

Oh! The vultures know me so well. I'm the only thing left in this newsgroup
of interest, aren't I?

Oh! What a hostage to fortune. More accurately, you're the only thing left
that's of zero interest (given that WL's in solitary confinement, but I
think he'll have a cellmate now). I can't recall the last time you posted
anything of note whatsoever.

On 16/02/2017 21:01, wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 20:02:23 UTC, Col wrote:


He isn't lying. You posted something like "Watching......" as your very
first post to that group which was treated as rather bizarre but was
allowed to stand (yellow card). It was inferred that your future posting
would be closely monitored.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Nothing 'inferred'. Nothing done. I watched and decided the group was far better than this one. Bruce and I have no animosity in the slightest. mitchell lies.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...te/6i2elX-IxTU

Now I've actually lookied it up, it was more than 'inferred' it was
*stated* that your future posts would be monitored closely because Bruce
didn't want the same disruption in the new group as on here.
It was a friendly warning but a warning nevertheless. It's meaning was
quite clear.
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg