Steven Briggs wrote:
In message , David Mitchell
writes

I'm using Weatherlink, but I think it's pretty average rather than good.
I started with Weather Display which I thought was far superior, but
developed faults and was unreliable.
Weatherlink has certainly been reliable, which is extremely important,
but
one day I will change, so will watch comments here with interest.
Thanks John for the link.

Another weatherlink user here.
Does the job, and is certainly reliable, I not had any problems.

I used WeatherLink for a few months before becoming disillusioned by it.
It's fine for the odd usage, but anything complicated and you soon come
across problems. Little things, like not being able to do anything while
it is downloading data from the station; odd errors (can't find NOAA
headers after running it for a long time); poor flexibility with
templates for publishing to websites; the interface is clunky (feels
like a Windows 3.1 application rather than a Windows XP application);
only runs on Windows; etc.

In the end I gave up and wrote my own software. Once I have downloaded
the data from the station and written it to a standard database I can
access it any way I like. Certainly a lot better if you want to publish
the data on your website. I might get round to packaging it up and
distributing it for free on my website some time...

--
Jonathan Stott
Canterbury Weather: http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/