View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 1st 05, 01:15 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
[email protected] stevex11@aol.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Aug 2005
Posts: 9
Default Global warming explained


Keith Dancey wrote:
In article , (Adrian D. Shaw) writes:

http://www.venganza.org/ (scroll down to the graph)

May be junk, but it still sort of illustrates some of the problems in actually
proving GW.



It illustrates a coincidence, not a "relationship": to do that he would need
to demomstrate the cause-and-effect between the population of Pirates and
atmospheric temperature. Besides which, his Pirate numbers are all wrong,
since they moved into Administration.

People fall for coincidences all the time because they do not understand the
fundamental difference between dependent and independent actions.

Gordon Brown is a Good Chancellor, is an example.



Cheers,


keith








---
Iraq: 6.5 thousand million pounds, 90 UK lives, and counting...
100,000+ civilian casualties, largely of coalition bombing...
London?...


Keith,

You are missing the point.

You do not need to prove a cause and effect between pirate numbers and
global temperatures. You just need to have faith! Isn't that what
religion and ID is all about.

You obviously haven't, yet, been touched by His Noodly Appendage!

Steve Richards