Dave.C wrote:
Well put, I thought.

And then you went and spoiled it by top posting?

As for Lawrencianism in any of it's forms, never trust a man who
believes in chance. And even less trust a man whose disbeliefs are
based on it.

Chaos is not an option if you do not know what causes weather. Chaos is
a way of not dealing with the lack of facts. It seems to suit people of
a certain persuasion, though.

Whatever the truth of that situation. The product of the error is
cumulative if there are less people to draw the line on it.

Closing down weather stations is completely the wrong way to go about
things. Someone shoot Andrew Lane and a few of his penny pinching
cronies and lets get meteorology back on an even keel.