"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
ups.com...
One last time, James. Try to learn
something this time.

There are many ways to correct for UHI.
GISS uses nighttime lights as observed
by satellites. IMHO, this is the best way.
USHCN uses census data. Both methods
agree that UHI correction is small and
positive in the US.

That's insane. Lights mean population. Nothing seems to point out highways,
less population in maintaining agriculture, corporate farming or anything
else having to do with paving, destruction of natural landscapes. Lighting
is even more dumb than almanac population figures. Where else would they get
it?

We're not talking about UHI data Roger. We're taliking about "NON-UHI" data.
Where the hell is it? The lighting concept is merely a substitution for
population. More fraudulent bull****.