November 14th 05, 09:12 PM
posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Sep 2004
Posts: 224
|
|
Score one for Astrology: Tropical Depression #27 flies out ofAstrologer Piers Corbyn's Butt.
Jik Bombo wrote:
"Scott" wrote in message
...
Jik Bombo wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message
egroups.com...
The data I used are the best available to me.
The data are from the NOAA web page given at this URL:
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/...arandStorm.htm
The number of storms were counted on the yearly
maps provided.
If you have better data for Atlantic Basin huricane numbers,
Mr. Bombast, please post them here. Realize that your
data would have to significantly differ from those i used
in order to change the 1 in 10,000 event calculation.
The data I used are below:
Was your data collected under the same condition and in the same manner
all the way back to 1851?
No?
Then address the implications of that revelation.
I believe that discussion has already occurred.
And yet Roger continues to use incomplete datasets.
That's the coin of the realm with AGW.
It doesn't matter that the data is incomplete, it supports the theory.
The meteorological dataset that is totally complete
does not exist.
Scott
|