In article E05ff.114013$S4.84492@edtnps84,
"Coby Beck" wrote:

"Steve Schulin" wrote in message
...
In article FL3ff.200479$ir4.167709@edtnps90,
"Coby Beck" wrote:

But what about this, Steve? Do you think that Corbyn's prediction was
fulfilled? As far as I can see, it wasn't, #27 didn't become a tropical
storm. Am I wrong about that?

You are right about that. As was the kook when he stated the same fact
in this thread yesterday. Here was my reply to him: "That's true enough.
The fact remains that the biggest storm since Tropical Depression 26
formed when and where Corbyn forecast."

Ok, so we all agree that this prediction failed, though it was close. ...

I don't think we agree on the implications of what's transpired in this
case. At 4 AM on November 15, 2005, the National Hurricane Center
discussed TD27, noting, in part, that "THE OFFICIAL INTENSITY FORECAST
IS SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS ONE AND SHOWS THE SYSTEM BECOMING A HURRICANE
OVER THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN." That this short-term NHC forecast so well
matches the Solar Weather Technique forecast described in Oct 21 news
release is not done justice by the "Ok... this prediction failed... But
it is just a single data point..."

... But
it is just a single data point, keep them coming.

I figured there were folks who'd be interested. Glad to hear that you
wouldn't be offended by more.

Very truly,

Steve Schulin
http://www.nuclear.com