NobodyYouKnow wrote:
Steve Schulin wrote:
The first finding that CO2 lagged, rather
than led, temperature change was quite a blow
Really. In reality it led to a check of the analysis which found an error in
the timeline related to O18/016 depostion rates that changed the lag to a
small fraction of the error bars. You really have to include the QUALITY of
the data when trying to reach firm conclusiosn.
Are you referring to Shackleton (2000) here, in particular?
I did some reading, and learned quite a bit. This is a canard that
quacks very differently now.
------------------------------------
SwimJim
The great tragedy of science -- the
slaying of a beautiful hypothesis
by an ugly fact. - Thomas Huxley
------------------------------------