Harold Brooks wrote:
What you quote yourself as writing below isn't remotely close to a
"forewarning" for the tsunami.
You absolute cretin.
I was warning that there would be a disaster that spell and you saw
millions die and that's all you have to say?
Rot in hell.
*********************
Perhaps someone else can do better. If so why not tell me about it?
And if any jumped up paper pushers want to put me in their kill files
for MySake if not God's -or any sexual one; keep me there.
For any one meek enough and serious enough to want to know more, this
is how that disasterous spell was forecast. (Harold Brooks, kindly ****
off will you? Go and ply your trolls elsewhere.)
The original thread was posted here. Similar posts may have been made
to one or two other newsgroups around that time:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci...3ddbd546f85ec1
I got the times of the phases from Fred Espinak:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html#y2004
This gave a run of the phases as:
JAN. 7 15 40 JAN. 15 4 46
JAN. 21 21 05 JAN. 29 6 03 FEB. 6 8 47 FEB. 13 13 40
FEB. 20 9 18 FEB. 28 3 24 MAR. 6 23 14 MAR. 13 21 01
MAR. 20 22 41 MAR. 28 23 48 APR. 5 11 03 APR. 12 3 46
APR. 19 13 21 APR. 27 17 32 MAY 4 20 33 MAY 11 11 04
MAY 19 4 52 MAY 27 7 57 JUNE 3 4 20 JUNE 9 20 02
JUNE 17 20 27 JUNE 25 19 08 JULY 2 11 09 JULY 9 7 34
JULY 17 11 24 JULY 25 3 37 JULY 31 18 05 AUG. 7 22 01
AUG. 16 1 24 AUG. 23 10 12 AUG. 30 2 22 SEPT. 6 15 11
SEPT. 14 14 29 SEPT. 21 15 54 SEPT. 28 13 09 OCT. 6 10 12
OCT. 14 2 48 OCT. 20 21 59 OCT. 28 3 07 NOV. 5 5 53
NOV. 12 14 27 NOV. 19 5 50 NOV. 26 20 07 DEC. 5 0 53
DEC. 12 1 29 DEC. 18 16 40 DEC. 26 15 06
The weather forecast was worked out by simply dividing the hour of the
time of the phase by three.
If it divided equally by 6 (that is: If he phase fell on 12 or 6
o'clock) that gave me dull overcast or misty weather (which we now know
equates with the cyclonic maximum for the southern part of the North
Atlantic.)
If it divided by 3 but not by 6 ( i.e. 3 or 9 o'clock) that gave me the
spell for thunder of the sort you could set your clock by in Abergele
or Stoke on Trent.
If it left a remainder of 1 hour (e.g.7 o'clock) that gave me the
spells for the cyclonic weather over western Europe.
If it divided by three to give a remainder of 2 (e.g. 5 o'clock) that
put the cyclone at home on the longitude of Iceland.
Of course only a fool would attempt to explain what caused this without
knowing more about it. And a really stupid fool of the proportions of
an Harold Brooks would attempt to poke at the system without making
even a slight attempt to understand it. (Harold; I told you to **** off
you ****! There is only more of this in store for you.)
(I told you he was a bloody big fool didn't I?)
OK, so let's take it from the middle of October:
OCT. 14 2 48 OCT. 20 21 59 OCT. 28 3 07 NOV. 5 5 53
NOV. 12 14 27 NOV. 19 5 50 NOV. 26 20 07 DEC. 5 0 53
DEC. 12 1 29 DEC. 18 16 40 DEC. 26 15 06
These phases are written month day hour minute. From the
precepts:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...fd32adde2c5e/#
The time is reduced to the nearest hour with an allowance of something
in the region of 10 to 15 minutes. So tha the 14th OCT. 02:48 = 03:00
we get:
03:00 Thundery
22:00 Cyclonic.
03:00 Thundery
06:00
14:30 I would ave been thrown by this, then. It's half way between fine
and thunder. A frontal system of rather difficult weather to get a fix
on. Lots of broken occlusions or a mainly warm but an occluded front
going to Norway. (So you see; they are still a PITA.)
06:00
20 00
00:00
01 30 This is an interesting one being a spell for intense cyclonic
weather in the UK but an half of the thudery one.
16:40
15:00 This is a thunder spell. And for January the third:
18:00
Note they almost all divide nicely by 3. In fact so many were falling
on that time I bet a synergistical system built up so that the spells
ran through the ones that would normally have been different.
And further, that one at 16:40 is a very unstable spell (as it happens,
it is the time of phase for the spell at the moment (13 April 2006
16:40 ) if you want to look.) Check out what I have said about such
types in the past.
Had I known then what I know now, I would have been shouting a lot
louder that something major was about to happen to the system.
But I was uneasy about my abilities. (Which is why I was a little more
gentle with Harold Brooks earlier on in this thread. Some-one drag away
his sorry carcass now, will you?)
(Someone else check what the Chandler Wabble was doing at the end of
2004. I bet it wound down by Novemberish and started to come right in
January.) It certainly did something momentous during that run.
Prove me wrong.
*******
"If I listened to the opinions of generals or military officers in the
field, we'd never have had the success we've had in running this war.
So, I'm not about to start listening now."
Donald H. Rumsfeld.
(According to the Wikipedia he served in the U.S. Navy from 1954 to
1957 as an aviator and flight instructor. Rumsfeld is an Eagle Scout
and recipient of the Distinguished Eagle Scout Award from the Boy
Scouts of America. After that his career appears to have nose dived
sharply.)