On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:36:29 +0100, Jim
wrote:

In article , Pete Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:19:58 +0100, (Jim)
wrote:

Pete Lawrence wrote:

Quite shocking! ;-)

http://www.globalobservers.net/SkyIm..._IMG_2136a.jpg

Nice one Pete!

Thanks Jim. A couple more here...

http://www.globalobservers.net/SkyIm..._IMG_2130a.jpg

http://www.globalobservers.net/SkyIm..._IMG_1951a.jpg

Thanks.

If you don't mind me asking, how are you taking these?

With a camera ;-)

Actually Jim, I'm using two - my old Canon 10D and my Canon 20Da. Both
fitted with 'normal' lenses and tripod mounted. I also have two
TC80-N3 programmable shutter releases which were set to take 60s
images with a 1s catch-up for the cameras (the 10D needed a reasonable
amount of time to catch up when the sequence was stopped but the 20Da
finished immediately).

The fork in blue was 2s (this was an early shot and the sky was
bright) @ ISO100, f/22, 65mm lens

The other two were both 60s @ ISO400, f/10, 28mm lens. I notice that
one was a 43s exposure. This ould have been because I happened to be
walking past that particular camera and manually terminated the
exposure after the fork. One doesn't want the neighbours shining a
torch up a the window asking "what yer doing?" after somthing like
that ;-)

Out of the total catch, I guess I got about a dozen reasonable shots.
--
Pete
http://www.digitalsky.org.uk