Ian wrote:

I find it hard to discuss climate change with a country who will not conform
to the Kyoto treaty.

Well that's all right then, because you were being invited to discuss the
question by a single individual, you see, not a country.

A bollock brain wouldn't understand the concept of a discussion group
anyway.

The problem with glowball warming is that the participants in any
arguments on the subject soon get overheated. It's best left alone.
There are virulent specimen kicking **** out of each other on all the
boards remotely touching "on topic" with it.

Raise a serious question such as: "Where did all the carbon dioxide
that some 40 or 50 years ago was said to inhabit the sky, disappear
to?" and you get called a lying troll.

It's the stuff of monkeys.

Don't think that I am self satisfied with the status quo. I am not. I
just think that the story is not something to do with the make up of
the atmosphere so much as something that would have affected our
ancestors in a similar manner.

We know that these things have occurred before and they have occurred
before industrialisation.