Roger Coppock wrote:
Yep, you don't see the fossil fools of this forum
doing that, or anything else with data.


Most people have lives Roger.


Why do you think that the chart and the temperature
record should follow each other? I don't.


Then why chart the CO2 and use it in a GW argument? Why not use a CH4
chart?


Do you know that:

--- a very good approximation for CO2 forcing is:
CO2_Forcing = 5.35 * ln( FinalCO2 / InitialCO2 )
and, as the graph clearly shows, CO2 is rising
exponentially. So, ln ( exp() ) == a straight line.

-- There is a huge half century delay and low pass
filter between planetary forcing and global mean
surface temperature rise.


That only shows CO2 is increasing, it DOES NOT show that it is the (or
a) significant cause of GW at it's current levels.

Over the last three decades, there is no correlation
between solar forcing and global mean temperature.
Try to find a valid signal detection of the 11-year
solar cycle in the global mean surface temperature.
You can't.


Of course there is a correlation and it's nearly exact. I'll post both
of them again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:S...GISS_model.gif
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/

You can almost overlay them on top of each other, THAT is a
correlation.

Now try that with your CO2 record from here...
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/data/simodel/
Hint: It's the green line, Roger.


I've got data, you've got pure fantasy.

Check the links above, Both based on data.....
You're wrong again, Roger.
This is kinda fun........