(Eric Swanson) wrote in
:

In article ,
says...

How The Arctic ICE MELTED.

http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html

Some sample news stories which describe various aspects of the problem
followed by visual tutorial of the heat dynamics doing the damage.

Nice pictures.

However, the graphics don't prove HOW the ice melted, just that the
polynia in the Beaufort Sea and the area of low concentration in the
Atlantic side did form in unusual areas. Why not add the buoy maps,
showing the flow of ice away from the polynia? The thing may have
formed as the result of wind forcing which we know pushed the sea-ice
away. The flip side would be that there may have been an unusually
large outflow of sea-ice thru the Fram Strait.


The graphics prove that the heat was delivered to the location where the ice melted. Any arguments against
the idea, that tropical heat where it does not belong, have to present a cogent theory why heat would not
melt ice when the two are placed together.

The delivery system includes three well known parts: Hurricanes have raised oceanic heat as rain water,
Hurricanes push waters before their winds as "surge", and Hurricanes carry high kinetic energy called winds.

One should not suppose that any one of the three are absent without carrying the burden of proof to support
the suggestion.

Each liter of rainwater is capable of melting 13 grams of ice for each degree above 0C the rainfall is. In 2006
the prevailing pattern of air flow has been on a line from the tropical Pacific off the coast of Japan to Alaska
an into the Arctic. a seperate eddy of that water current flow is through the Bering Sea. Likewise each liter
of seawater is capable of melting 13 grams of ice for each degree above 0C.

Even if no rainfall and no surge waters exist, the mere presence of tropical clouds over the Arctic ice pack is
itself suffucient to explain atypical melting behaviors, as clouds are omnidirectional radiators of infrared
energy in the exact same bandwidth as ice is an absorber.

25 megabytes of data was insufficient to knock the idiocy from Eric Swanson's head.

Another 497 files of images and texts composing 17 more megabytes is not likely to do the job either, but for
the ones who are not over the hill and still capable of making reasoned conclusions from compelling data,
here are additional facts.

Hurricane IOKE is an object of interest in and of itself. It reached category 5 hurricane status and stayed
above category 4 or 5 for many days in a 4,000 miles trek across the Pacific ocean. At it's conclusion the
storm was broken by strong windshear and pockets of cooler waters, leaving unspent remnants of rainclouds
accumulated over 29C, 85F sea temperatures, and this was swiftly moved and deposited over the the site of
the giant ice melt in early September. It is one very conspicuously visible specimen of the class of events
occurring all summer.

Added to the ongoing "Heads UP" notices posted on regular intervals is this latest addition:
http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Mystery_Solv...ry_Solved.html

http://ecosyn.us/Temp_4/Arctic_Ice_Melt.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IOKE_IR_Funktops.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_sep_06/IR_WEUS.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_Aug2/temp_aug2.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july8/ITCZ_july6-8.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july7/ITCZ.html
http://ecosyn.us/1/temp_july9/july9.html