View Single Post
  #28   Report Post  
Old November 3rd 06, 07:40 PM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,uk.environment
John Beardmore John Beardmore is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Default Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change

In message , Orator
writes
Lloyd Parker wrote:


All the GH gases are equivalent to CO2 of 430 ppm.


Man, talk about spin-doctoring! How much are you getting paid for this?


Actually - all he's done to work out the meaning is read what's
written.

Why can't you ?


The "greenhouse gases" has been defines as "CO2" it is clear as clear
can be!


Where ?


The "equivalent to" refers to "parts per million (ppm)" - a measure!

Again in the unlikely event that it was intended as you say, it is no
less than scientific fraud to give a deliberate impression it is solely
CO2,


But they don't ! That's why they say "equivalent".


and made even worse by then comparing it solely to CO2! It is _fraud_
on par with the Piltdown man!


Nonsense - it's just a way ox expressing the aggregate effect of a
basket of GHGs. There is nothing new here - at least not to those
familiar with the subject.


It is history and it shows that high levels of CO2 does not correlate
to "human caused" as your dogma recites.


It does / did ??


Cheers, J/.
--
John Beardmore