November 7th 06, 09:59 AM
posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,uk.environment
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2005
Posts: 244
|
|
Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
In article ,
Retief wrote:
On Fri, 03 Nov 06 11:22:33 GMT, (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
The "greenhouse gases" has been defines as "CO2" it is clear as clear
can be! The "equivalent to" refers to "parts per million (ppm)" - a
measure!
"gases" is plural, doofus.
That in no way addresses the challenge to the assertion that CO2 is a
"prototypical greenhouse gas, whose characteristics explain and define
all other GHGs..." -- which is what your "equivalence" implies...
It is history and it shows that high levels of CO2 does not correlate to
"human caused" as your dogma recites.
Nobody has ever claimed humans caused the CO2 to go up millions of years
ago,
but we are the cause today.
So what?... Did 6000 ppm exterminate all life on Earth? Oh, that's
right...all life _was_ exterminated, which is why you are NOT arguing
with me now (since all life on Earth died)...
I do not really care if bacteria survive. I care if human civilization
survives.
Wait, I think that I understand your argument Lloyd... Under your
model, all life _was_ exterminated and eliminated from the Earth (how
could it not be, at 6000 ppm of CO2). And then 6000 years ago _your_
god created life (and humans, and dinosaur bones, and pottery sherds
and...), and that's why you are now here to argue your creationist
nonsense with us...
Retief
|