View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Old November 10th 06, 07:55 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,uk.environment
John Beardmore John Beardmore is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Default Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change

In message , Retief
writes
On Tue, 07 Nov 06 10:17:31 GMT, (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

The sun behaves approximately as a black body. If the sun increases
in temperature (and output), the spectrum shifts towards the blue (and
increased UV).


You're confusing intensity with temp. They are 2 different things.


No Lloyd, you are once again grasping at strawmen.

If the temperature of the sun increases, the emitted spectrum shifts
(as a black body).


So you don't mean that the spectral lines move ? OK, and that energy
distribution within the lines and continuum change ?


If the temperature of the sun increases, the rate at which energy
radiates away from this hotter object increases.


Yes. And the extent of this is ?


BTW Lloyd, I've noticed that you refuse to answer my questions
regarding your temperature and CO2 records.

Flooding what is now New York wouldn't have had much effect a million years
ago. Would it today?


So your predicition is that New York will be flooded?


It certainly looks as if more frequent floods may be expected.


We presume that Parker is prepared to support this claim with data...


A trivial google search finds

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20061024/

which mostly seems to be based on NOAA data.


J/.
--
John Beardmore