Adam Lea wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...


Does that mean then, that the irrefutable warming has beneficial
aspect-less damaging storms?


No it means the NAO is transitioning into a more negative phase.

How would it go about doing that and what is that fool talking about
"irrefutable warming".

With a negative oscillation there is little distinction between the
lows and the highs. It can't get much more negative than having both
sets of air masses at the same pressure.

Well I suppose it is possible to have Low Pressure areas at an higher
pressure than the High Pressure areas. I don't think that it has ever
happened since Noah came out of the Ark though.

As for the so called glowballer's ideas being irrefutable; it is far
more likely that the lack of pressure differential in the North
Atlantic is the sole cause of storms continuing up into the Arctic
rather than broaching on Scotland and Norway.

With the plethora of cyclones doing just that this year, it is more
likely that the mixing of deep and surface waters in the Arctic has
been more complete this year than in more "normal" times.

And it is this mixing that is showing up as the unusual temperature
gradients in the North Atlantic surface waters. Quite how this works I
wouldn't know, so I can't say but it is a damn site more likely than
the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by a margin of one or
two parts in a million: