Edited from:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.g...8c3b924528173c
1
From: Michael Mcneil Date: Thurs, Jan 27 2005 11:51 pm
2005/01/27
04.89N 82.54W 4.7 SOUTH OF PANAMA
05.56N 94.36E 5.8 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
08.02N 94.15E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.15E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.90N 94.33E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.10N 93.98E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.96N 94.17E 5.2 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.30E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.02E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.02E 5.0 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.98N 94.03E 5.7 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.89N 93.96E 5.3 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.03N 93.95E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
27.23N 140.34E 4.9 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION
14.01N 91.86W 4.4 GUATEMALA
2005/01/26
08.05N 94.09E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.04N 94.08E 4.6 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
02.91N 94.43E 6.1 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
07.99N 94.07E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
06.87S 129.54E 5.5 BANDA SEA
08.30N 93.98E 5.6 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
03.23N 96.23E 5.1 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
07.99N 94.31E 4.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.07N 94.29E 4.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.84N 93.69E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
45.97N 151.86E 4.5 KURIL ISLANDS
04.65N 93.26E 4.7 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
61.47N 151.50W 3.8 SOUTHERN ALASKA
05.40N 92.90E 4.6 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
08.09N 94.12E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
24.59S 179.67E 466.4 4.8 SOUTH OF FIJI ISLANDS
Is there a cyclone in the region? A super typhoon?
10
From: Roger Stanley Dubok - Date: Sat, Jan 29 2005 12:09 am
Very interesting, please tell me more.
11
From: Roger Stanley Dubok Date: Sat, Jan 29 2005 12:08 am
No he doesn't agree?
So what are your methods?
Roger Stanley Dubok
"Michael Mcneil" wrote in
news:55c96a6e571a471bdbd3704c3d50df37.45219@mygate .mailgate.org:
...first arm yourself with the logic Newton used as propounded by the
great thinkers of his time:
An object will not move until it is moved;
having moved will not stop until it is stopped
all the above actions have counter-actions.
12
From: Michael Mcneil Date: Sat, Jan 29 2005 10:35 am
"Roger Stanley Dubok" wrote in message
No he doesn't agree?
So what are your methods?
What does seem true is that a run of lunar phases that in the normal
course of events tend to induce a certain sort of weather, will if
there
is a run of them,
[as for example he
Daren 11S SWI 17 January 21 January 45 40
Ernest 12S SWI 20 January 24 January 100 90
Tim 13S AUS 23 January 25 January 40 45
Felapi - SWI 27 January 28 January - 35
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/.../january.html]
induce some sort of powerful harmonic associated with
super-typhoons (F4 or 5 Hurricanes) or a spate of destructive
tornadoes.
Other give-aways are also weather related -as for instance when a long
standing (by UK terms) weather system breaks, usually having held off
an
occluded front building up in the Atlantic until it moves over to
Norway
or the UK.
And yet another method is when one notices a degree of uncertainty
from the presenters of weather forecasts on the news programmes.
In that case provided that the lunar phases accord with the sort of
weather actually occurring, there is likely to be a tropical or
extra tropical storm broaching somewhere on the planet.
If, as is the case at the moment, there is discord then there is likely
to be a large earthquake. However before a large earthquake occurs it
is
"usual" for the run of phases to come to an end. This present run is
not
due to end until the second half of February.
In fact a run of extremely similar lunar phases (such as for example
for
the 25th Jan, 2nd and 8th February [2005] aught to induce an even
stronger
spell or harmonic that I presume will run through the weaker spell on
the 16th.
The problem then is that the phase for the 24th of February is that it
should induce marked anticyclonic weather. But that is exactly the sort
of weather we are already having.)
If you take a look at the weather in the UK for 1976 however, you will
notice that there was a long spell of very hot weather that summer
bringing drought to a lot of the Sahel and most unusually to parts of
the UK. When the drought in the UK broke there was a large earthquake
in
Chile.
Almost none of the lunar phases for that summer would have warned of a
drought. Small wonder then that the so called experts have rejected any
comments that the moon may have some relationship to weather or
earthquakes.
Smaller wonder too, that despite throwing money at geologists
and their kin, none of the finest brains in that branch of academia
outside of China (where a more holistic approach has proved effective
at
times) none of them has come up with anything useful.
Nothing even remotely interesting in fact.
Well, you may find beach balls interesting. (Not my cup of tea though.)
Here is something I prepared earlier:
This phase is the second or last quarter JAN 03 17:46
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/.../browse_frm/th...
03 January 17:43. Unsettled, overcast and breezy.
10 January 12:04. Unsettled and overcast.
17 January 07:00. Fine, high pressure. Actually rain.
**************************************
25January 10:33. Ridges cols or troughs
Be nice if it is just Mount St Helens:
**************************************
02 February 07:25. Ridges cols or troughs
08 February 22:30. Ridges cols or troughs (Talk about vague; eh? How
about the next one)
16 February 00:20. Unsettled, overcast and high wind but heading
towards
ridges cols or troughs.
24 February 04:55. Fine, high pressure. Look out for something nasty
somewhere on the planet around this week. Either that or it will carry
through with the unsettled stuff and... God help us all in May.
Or as it now looks likely:
Either that or it will carry through with the anticylonic stuff and...
God help us all in May.
[I can't remember off hand exactly what happened in May but the North
Atlantic Oscillation took a nose dive from around April when the whole
of the northern hemisphere except for Ireland and the UK were covered
in snow. This negative NAO situation persisted until very recently]
29
From: Michael Mcneil Date: Fri, Jan 28 2005 11:29 am
"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:d218a52078832351d09809af7cf75b2b.45219@mygate .mailgate.org
And the beat goes on with more fairly high mag quakes in the Nicobar
Islands region so far today.
Is there a cyclone in the region? A super typhoon?
I was not expecting to find a cyclone in the area as it is so close to
the equator. Anyone who knows anything about the behaviour of the sun
and moon will appreciate what I mean.
However there seems to be precious little going on anywhe
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html
Rather a slow download if you are dialup but well worth waiting for.
I wonder how these things relate to anticyclonic activity. Are the
aurorae still flaring?
30
From: George Date: Fri, Jan 28 2005 11:54 am
Thanks for proving yourself wrong, once again. Looks like you did the
work for us.
33
From: Roger Stanley Dubok Date: Sat, Jan 29 2005 12:13 am
So if there isn't anything precious going on, then why did these quakes
happen?
34
From: Michael Mcneil Date: Sat, Jan 29 2005 9:18 am
I did not state that earthquakes are caused by cyclones. I have notice
a
coincidence between large quakes and cyclonic activity (no more and no
less.) As it happens there were a couple of cyclones broaching
Madagascar
apparently around that time. I couldn't see anything about them though.
There looked to be something off southern Australia too but that one
(if
there was one) was off the map.
What makes these Nicobar quakes unusual is that they are unusual.
There was a spate of similar ones just after the Banda Atjeh disaster.
(There were no others reported on the same NEIC site for that day.)
35
From: Michael Mcneil Date: Sun, Jan 30 2005 10:25 am
2005/01/27
04.89N 82.54W 4.7 SOUTH OF PANAMA
05.56N 94.36E 5.8 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
08.02N 94.15E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.15E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.90N 94.33E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.10N 93.98E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.96N 94.17E 5.2 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.30E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.02E 5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.97N 94.02E 5.0 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.98N 94.03E 5.7 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.89N 93.96E 5.3 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.03N 93.95E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
27.23N 140.34E 4.9 BONIN ISLANDS, JAPAN REGION
14.01N 91.86W 4.4 GUATEMALA
2005/01/26
08.05N 94.09E 5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.04N 94.08E 4.6 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
02.91N 94.43E 6.1 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
07.99N 94.07E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
06.87S 129.54E 5.5 BANDA SEA
08.30N 93.98E 5.6 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
03.23N 96.23E 5.1 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
07.99N 94.31E 4.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
08.07N 94.29E 4.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
07.84N 93.69E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
45.97N 151.86E 4.5 KURIL ISLANDS
04.65N 93.26E 4.7 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
61.47N 151.50W 3.8 SOUTHERN ALASKA
05.40N 92.90E 4.6 OFF W COAST OF N SUMATRA
08.09N 94.12E 4.8 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
24.59S 179.67E 466.4 4.8 SOUTH OF FIJI ISLANDS
Well we can always fight among ourselves.
It is not so much strange as interesting that almost every quake since
the big one has been in the area devastated.
And no sign of them abating:
5.8 SIMEULUE, INDONESIA
5.4 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.1 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.4 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.2 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
4.3 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
5.9 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
6.3 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
5.4 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.0 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.2 NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.
6.1 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
6.0 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
5.8 MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES
6.2 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.6 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.3 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.6 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.7 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.9 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.9 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.5 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.4 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
6.3 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
6.2 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
6.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.7 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.7 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
7.5 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
6.1 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.9 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
6.0 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
5.9 NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION
5.8 NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
9.0 OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/.../browse_frm/th...
[You can see from the quality of the discussions -as for example, with
the fool below; that I was somewhat loath to respond to more than a few
posts in this thread. Matters seem to have resolved themselves somewhat
since, with the like of Felix Tilley doing me a great favour in placing
my posts in his kill file filters. Why it took him so long is
anyone's guess.]
36
From: George Date: Sun, Jan 30 2005 12:10 pm
Northern California, Mindinao Phillipines, and New Britain are not in
the area of
the December 26th earthquake.
[If only he had the ability to read between the lines, he might notice
one or two other lines:
"It is not so much strange as interesting that almost every
quake since
the big one has been in the area devastated."
All the above tended to sidetrack anyone interested in a discussion
about the frequency of typhoons and hurricanes of rather large
proportions at around the time of large magnitude quakes or series of
swarms of them.
But it's never too late.]