
December 20th 07, 12:16 AM
posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6
|
|
Hey.
"Count LeChance VonShnaps" wrote in message
...
"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
oups.com...
I just noticed this run:
Nov 28 06:29 Dec 5 00:25 Dec 12 14:32
http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...hases2001.html
For the unwashed this is the code:
(I have to repeat this every so often as the more knowledgeable among
you tend to lack insight and find the idea of new ideas far from
ideal.)
OK, the wet weather in the NW Atlantic basin occurs off the UK with a
Low at the appropriate longitude and latitude off Iceland or points
south to Spain. Where the Low is is governed by the harmonic set up by
the astrometry that also times the phases of the moon.
And for the above appears to be when the phase is around 1:30 am or pm.
A little earlier and the weather is still wet but not so intense. A
little earlier still it is more like drizzle or mist, and yet earlier
still and it is fine.
The code goes roughly like this:
5 am or pm and it is anticyclonic.
1:30 am or pm very wet.
6 or 12 am or pm misty.
And this run of spells is for misty. Or rather they all just miss that
spell by 30 minutes. (Well last weeks and this weeks does. !4:32 is
more like an hour out. Except it is a weak spell in my not
inconsiderable opinion.)
Looks interesting is what I mean. What it is is something like half way
to another severe typhoon and the typhoons seem to drag with them a
series of large mag quakes. If that happens, the cyclones in the North
Atlantic will go north again and not break on Norway and dissipate. A
situation akin to a negative NAO.
So we have two half past misties and a half way to thunder coming up.
I would like to stay up and discuss this further but one has work on
the morrow and thus needs to retire and cogitate as there is no longer
time to do the thing properly and vegetate.
One must always allow time to vegetate although I hardly consider feeding
the mind a waste of time. I have learned more on the internet over the
past 10 years about weather, history and many other subjects than I did
attending college and obtaining a degree, including all school prior to
that. I would have liked to gone into meteorology but the classes
required to become a true meteorologist are not something I would have
enjoyed in the least, in fact, I would have hated most of them.
Ironically, I find weather to be the most interesting of all my hobies,
it's unfortunate that so much **** is involved and one must learn so much
useless drivel to become a meteorologist. I am convinced that with a 3
month training course, I could do the job as well as or better than many
of those clowns I see on TV every night, it's the guys behind the scene
that have the tough job. If an individual has internet access, there is
simply no reason to pay any attention to the local weather man as the NOAA
forcast discussions go well beyond anything that is convered on TV. In
short, the Weather Channel is a joke, although their storm stories can be
interesting.
Speaking of the UK, what is the single worst storm you recall? It seems
that UK weather, for lack of a better word, is quite boring. I mean,
that's certainly not a bad thing but it seems rather predictable, where as
the Upper Midwest, where I grew up, is quite the opposite. I mean, the
highest point in England in just shy of 1,000 meters so I can't imagine
the topograhy plays a big role and you are too close to the ocean to
receive any severe winter weather. You are too far north to get what
would be considered a bad tropical cyclone.
I feel fortunate that I grew up in an area where we experienced all kinds
of weather, from blistering heat during the summer, as high as 40+
centigrade to bitter cold, -45 centigrade. Not to mention the severe
thunderstorms during the summer which are the result of being close enough
to Canada to get the occasional shot of cold air, even in late June. The
real severe weather season starts in March though, I've seen temps of 30
degrees centigrade on March 30th followed by terrible blizzards, no more
than 2 or 3 days later. You get everything in the Upper Midwest, except
Hurricanes of course and I can certainly do without those! Only a
complete buffoon would want to experience a hurricane and we've seen
plenty of those here in the states, some of them have traded their large
egos for their lives.
This might be an interesting link for you, learning what a harsh climate
is all about. The other side to this is I've been to London in July and
found the weather to be absolutely wondeful, temps in the low 20's, no
wind and a nice soft breeze. Something you normally don't get where I
live in July! I am in Kentucky now and the average high temperature in
July is 31 degrees with humidity levels around 50 percent, on a good day.
On a bad day, 40 degrees with humidity levels in the 70's. As for British
weather in the winter, it stinks. I wouldn't mind your summers though,
even all the overcast days would be better than the heat!
http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical/winter_storms.htm
Hey Asshole (Weather Dork) why don't you read my thread, you might learn a
thing or two about real weather.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|