View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 29th 06, 06:13 AM posted to alt.disasters.misc,sci.geo.earthquakes,sci.geo.geology,alt.talk.weather
Timberwoof Timberwoof is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Default Earthquake Warning Dec. 21, 2006

In article .com,
"Weatherlawyer" wrote:

Petra wrote:

....... so what makes you think traditional seismic instruments are going to
detect any kind of a quake coming?
It doesn't seem to work here in the US, so why should it work abroad?


So what are you paying taxes for? To feed a dying chimp better bananas?

Even if the OP's methods don't work, at least they don't cost the
billions to run that accomplish a lot less.

Well that's not true. I couldn't manage without the NEIC lists but WWW
of seismographs and such like assorted paraphenalia are not being used
in anyway successfully according to the way they are intended are they?


Let's see now. Seismographs are being used to determine the location and
strength of earthquakes, to try to predict tsunamis, to learn the
interior structure of the Earth,. And they seem to be doing a bangup job
of it.

So explain to me your complaint again?

I have an idea that he is holding his cards too close to his chest
because he intends one day to make money out of his ideas. That is his
prerogative is it not?

I believe what he writes about lunar influence is just so much bull****
to distract the ingenuous and trolls.

It works very nicely on the latter.


I don't try to predict earthquake predictions.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
It's easy to say a war is so important your neighbor should go fight it for you.