Gianna wrote:

Happily, it did not suggest for a moment that pollution was anything but a
bad
idea. Essentially, it provided data on any causal link between higher
temperature and higher CO2, and demonstrated that the latter is caused by
the former, not vice versa.


Blimey! Are you sure they said that? How did they get round the problem that
the excess CO2 can be identified as being generated artificially? Also, why
does the growth in CO2 not reflect the cycles in tempurature?

--
Graham P Davis
Bracknell, Berks., UK
Send e-mails to "newsman" as mails to "newsboy" are ignored.