View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 19th 07, 12:15 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
[email protected] jmcc7777@yahoo.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Default Comparison between professional and amateur windspeed measurements.

Note Surface Temp. (3) - shows a disclaimer is important.

http://www.trafficweather.info/roadW....jsp?client=81

Station : Foyle Bridge
Organisation : The Meteorological Office - Northern Ireland


Time : 19.03.2007 12:00 GMT

Relative Humidity (1) 78 %

Rain State (1) none

Wind Speed (1) 11.3 m/s

Surface Temp (2) 6.8 °C

Surface Temp (3) 322.8 °C

Disclaimer - neither Vaisala or the owner of the data accept
responsibility for the accuracy or interpretation of the data





On Mar 19, 8:56 am, "Brian Blair"
wrote:
are they not from diff sites though?

ie it would be a decent comparison if the sites were both pro and amatuer in
the same location.

brian
aberfeldy

"Chris.Bee" wrote in message

oups.com...



Hi all


This isn't a dig at anybody (at all) but I noticed the storm
presently buffeting Denmark produced some amazing results in published
measured windspeed.


These images were lifted from the Danish national weather service
website: DMI: Dansk Meteorological Institute.


The first image shows professional measurements while the second shows
amateur measurements.


http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/2593/bvimagegw0.png


http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/569...agehomedw0.png


Could it really be said that most of the amateur figures have any
scientific value whatsoever?


Or even any real value to the amateur weather watchers themselves?


It is certainly an area where the Danish amateur meteorologist could
and should seriously improve their performance.


Any constructive thoughts?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -