Col wrote:
"Gianna" wrote in message
...
And for Col - I did read it properly - see above - did you? (-:

There is a link on that page towards the bottom right hand corner
entitled 'full summer 2007 forecast'.
I don't see how you could have missed it.


Why do you think I missed something simply because I questioned the usefulness
of the press release (actually, I responded to 'tish' and wrote 'tosh')?
I know I seldom stay on topic for long but this is the first time anyone has
complained because I did!

Why is it so difficult to understand that I replied to pe's point 'tish' which
refers to the press release, quoting the link provided by the OP?
The thread referred to one web page ... the press release. I did not involve
any secondary pages.

When asked why I thought the press release was tosh, I explained why.
The contents of the full forecast have no effect on my opinion of the press
release. It is tosh.

I can review the full forecast if you insist, but that rather ruins the word play.


--
Gianna

http://www.buchan-meteo.org.uk
* * * * * * *