On Jul 11, 8:45 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
The rise in the global mean surface temperature since 1985 was not
due to sunspots, solar cycle length, solar magnetic field, cosmic
rays,
or solar irradiance. These factors were all causing cooling during
the
period, if they were doing anything at all.

Please read this article and look carefully at the 6-part chart:http://environment.newscientist.com/...s-activity-rul...

The original article published by the Royal Society,
if you're a member or want to pay for it, is hehttp://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/c...4264320314105/

This puts the fossil fool's attempts at astrology to bed.

Denying the suns impact on global climate is like denying that The
Beatles had in impact on Rock and Roll.

Like denying the impact of oxygen on fire.

Like denying the impact of Bush on Saddam Hussein.

Like denying the impact of ......well, you get the idea.

Think about it for one quick second. What other single factor affects
the temperatures on the globe more than the sun? The sun rises and
temperatures go up. The sun goes down and the temperatures go down.
The sun rides low on the horizon and we have winter. The sun rides
high above the horizon and we have summer. Even clouds can't directly
impact the temperatures anywhere near as much as the position of the
sun. And clouds accounts for hundreds of times more direct impact on
temperatures than any and all of the greenhouse gases put together.

The reality of the physics of the universe cannot be overidden by
environmental activists wants and desires or computer models. Get real.