"Martin Brown" wrote in message


Nor the facts or anything involving the determining the scientific truth
- just like a lawyer.

People blindly using the phrase "fossil fuels" goad me though. If they
are fossil fuels, why did the sulphur and phosphorous beds separate out
from them and migrate to pastures new?

And how?

Ever heard of chemistry?

As a matter of fact I worked in a laboratory at one time. Physical
Chemistry. Just washing glasses as ot happens but I maintained a passing
interest in the subject.
Are you aware there are beds of sulphur and layers of guanoturned to
phosphate beds of strata. One of them is a fossil fuel is it not? No
carbon present funnily enough.

In or off the coast of Sweden a geological reasearch project brought up
oil from below or between granite. There is EVERY reason to suppose that
the oil and coal deposits are not fossils.

FACTS are what I was asking for fool!

Baliunas and Soon (two global warming sceptics) have various papers on
reconstructing the solar constant over the past century and were forced
to conclude that without including the contributions of greenhouse
gasses it is impossible to obtain energy balance in the latter part of
the 20th century.

Unless there is an alternative they overlooked.

Meanwhile, the physics and the chemistry of the carbon dioxide cycle
belittle and bedevil do they not?

(Would someone more acceptable to him than I care to elucidate?)




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG