"chemist" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Aug 1, 5:01 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Jul 31, 8:10 pm, (Eric Swanson) wrote:



In article .com,
says...

"Unfortunately,
small changes in the models can lead to a broad range of outcomes,
inviting debate over the actual causes of climate change."

So Models are Useless when it comes to forecasting future
climate .

The"statistical approach seeing it as puzzle" is my approach
and I have come to a very different conclusion than the
Professor. I have looked many more variables than he and my knowledge
of Astronomy and History has led me me to the conclusion that
the greenhouse effect is a myth.

Please provide a calculation of the Earth's temperature without the
Greenhouse Effect. Don't forget that convection, which operates in
parallel with the IR losses from the surface, cools further.
Then compare that with the actual measured value.

To do that calculation, Eric,
Tom would need to have . . .

(drum roll)

. . . a model.

Roger
I could show you and the rest that the science
of AGW rest on very shaky unprovable principles.

You always say that crap. But somehow, you never, ever do it. lol