On Aug 1, 11:38 am, Roger Coppock wrote:
How can anyone who claims to be a Christian be a
serial liar, Steve?

Roger's replies typically look stronger when he snips away that to
which he's replying, like here. I respectfuly ask any readers to
ponder why in this case he is silent on the prior-post-highlighted
fact that he posted (with title full of praise, I might add) a thread-
starting excerpt which matter-of-factly mentions the "subjective flaws
of climate models". If someone who disagreed with Roger had posted
such a comment about "subjective flaws of climate models", is there
much doubt that Roger's rapid response ritual, if he did deign to
comment, would be full of the dismissive, insulting clatter that seems
like his default mode around here.

Come on Roger. Are you healthy enough these days to put your mind to
talking science instead of talking trash?

Very truly,

Steve Schulin
http://www.nuclear.com