Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:37:34 -0700, Roger Coppock
wrote:
On Aug 28, 2:28 pm, Talk-n-Dog wrote:
[ . . . ]
Great, now we know that it's rainfall causing the oceans to rise, and
the polar ice can't be responsible for all of it.
It helps to read an article before commenting on it.
That way, your reply doesn't make you look like a total idiot.
He's not on my whitelist, so I never see his responses. But that sure
was dumb! While the hydrologic cycle's rate may possibly increase,
evaporated water will closely approximate the precipitated water in
short order.
Thanks I take your statements as a badge of honor. A closed mind is a
wonderful thing to waste. Maybe the extra water is coming from ground water?
Maybe your wrong? Maybe, since I was commenting on your synopsis of the
article and addressing the points that you highlighted, you didn't
clarify the point you were attempting to make? Maybe I'm right, and
it's not a rising ocean at all and I was laughing at you while I
proposed as ridiculous an Idea as you did. Sarcasm is above and beyond
some. The funny part is the holier than though attitude of you True
Believers. Your line of garbage changes by the hour, as you need to
adapt to all the BS you spew is debunked by average "idiots". If you
look back, you'd find I put forth contrastingly ridiculous ideas when I
see you True Believers spew idiotic Hypothesis.
I alway wonder how you'll explain away different ideas so that your
beloved GW can continue to be pertinent in your "life on the razors
edge" existence.
I'm open minded, I read it all and then decide, where as most of your
kind have your mind set and only accept what you consider supporting
information to enter your small little world of reality.
--
http://OutSourcedNews.com
Our constitution protects criminals, drunks and U.S. Senators. Which at
times are, one and the same...
The problem with the global warming theory, is that a theory is like a
bowl of ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bull**** to ruin the
whole thing. - Gump That -