View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old September 26th 07, 07:58 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.weather
Peter Hucker[_2_] Peter Hucker[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2007
Posts: 386
Default Nashville TN Moon and Clouds

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:39:41 -0700, Edward Erbeck
wrote:

Babs

Liked the Pictures. #1 is my favorite of the series.
Moon and Cloud shots are always a compromise. If you set the exposure
for the Moon the Clouds suffer. If (as in your shots) you go for detail in
the Clouds the Moon will be overexposed.
The sad reality short of "stacking images to combine 2 exposures where
each is set for the best of one or the other is until the folks that make
the Chips for Digital Cameras (I've long given up on any more advances in
Film Technology) can make Chips that have the Dynamic Range of the Human Eye
what you got is about as good as it gets.


But does the human eye have a bigger dynamic range? If you are
looking towards the sun, you cannot see other things very well.
--
This message has been brought to you by solar and wind power. Who needs the national grid?
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

Q: Why can't you have a circumcised Morris dancer?
A: Because you have to be a complete prick to be a Morris dancer.