On Oct 2, 5:28 am, William Asher wrote:
Whata Fool wrote:

snip

First, I am instantly suspicious when I hear you say phrases like:

"The premise is wrong, you can easily work the problem when the simple
truth of nature is known."

That is classic internet kook stuff.

And then it struck me that when you describe what you think is the
fundamental flaw in radiative transfer, it is like you are saying:

(1 + 1) + 2 = 4

and

1 + (1 + 2) = 4

so that this proves addition isn't associative because the parentheses are
in different places. See, you have all the physics right, essentially, but
then form this entirely bizarre conclusion from it.

Anyway, any time you feel like going through Chandrasekhar's book and
pointing out how he has misunderstood the "simple truth of nature" that
you alone have discovered I am all eyes.

--
Bill Asher
addition is not associative

2+3x5=17 or 2+3x5=25 or (2+3)x5=25 or 2+(3x5)=17
correct..........wrong..........correct........... correct.......
association and distribution are isolated from the basic rule book
the laws as agreed to by consensus unless a single exception can be
found and proven.