"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 8, 5:04 am, "Col" wrote:
"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Oct 7, 9:31 pm, "Phil Layton" wrote:

http://85.214.49.20/wz/pics/brack1.gif
May give an interuption to the present dry conditions in the south.

If that forecast bears fruit then there will have to be another super
cyclone to make it happen.

No, there are some fronts out in the Atlantic that are to
move across us that will make it happen!

Actually the requirement is nothing to do with air per se but then you
know that don't you.

The weather is nothing to do with the atmosphere?
Sure, I knew that....

I was wondering about the fallacy of directly linking the formation of
cyclones in general (and super cyclones in particular) with solar
radiation. It appears that insolation is the cause but it rules out
the fact that as a sump the 200 or so feet of sea surface that supply
the heat, washes that heat away PDQ.

Where does the heat go to?
Warm water rises as we all know, surely it stays at the surface?

But anyway, please demonstate the correlation between 'super
cyclones', whatever they are, Cat. 5 hurricanes? and the wet
weather that is expected over much of the UK tomorrow.

Too DQ for the effect to build up from 12 hours of sunshine every 24
hours of some shine.

And yet you can set your calendar by these seasonal storms.

I do?

Any thoughts on the subject, or would you just like to be clever...
one day

My thoughts are above.
You're the one making outlandish comments that the weather
in the Atlantic can be predicted a couple of days ahead by
the formation of 'super cyclones' *where* exactly I don't know!
--
Col

Steal a spaceship and head for the sun,
Shoot the stars with a lemonade ray gun.