On Oct 12, 9:30 am, Rob Overfield wrote:
Squelching through the mud, Bob Martin at , blathered on
thus, and it became the following missive...





in 232855 20071011 151411 wrote:

I'm sorry Tudor but I fail to see how you feel the need too back up
the BBC, they are increasingly biased in their representation of the
world. If you were upset at my jibe about living in Warlingham or was
it woldingham. Due to the mature of my work iver the years I have seen
people who are pivitol in creating local communities even to the point
of who lives there yet all in my experience that all ,all get the hell
away from the mess they helped create. It goes firther those who are
sift on crime arn't the ones that have to live with it are they. Why
not sell up home (you'll make a killing) move to the New Addingtom
Estate and lets see how liberal you are four years down the line.

Sorry but I see every day the stuff the BBC conciously ignores

Pardon?

Its damn good job lawrence doesn't hold a position in the BBC News hierachy,
cos he wouldn't hold it for long.

lawrence take your medication, you're even more looney than mayor ken of
london....

And if you don't like what we're saying, take it to uk.politics or whatever the
group is called.
--
Rob C. Overfield
Hull- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You do have a point about posting elswhere, but in mitigation over the
years where global warming was was seemingly still a theory. in the
last decade it's really taken off, It's now everywhere and this groop
has reflected that. Global Warming post years ago were politely
tolerated or met on many occassions with a "this is a weather group
not a climate NG. and a distiction between weather and climate sharply
drawn But now things have changed . I mean blimey even the Met office
calls it's self weather and climate change with much of it's output
dedicated to climate change.

Maybe if my post had agreed with the GW bandwagon you would have found
it more on topic with more toleration being shown.