Weather Banter - View Single Post

Lawrence Jenkins · October 12th 07, 02:48 PM posted to uk.sci.weather

"william brookson" william wrote in message
...

Tudor that first sentence says so much about you and confirms my
perception of you. By the way what is my inflammatory nonesense? That
I say the BBC are biased? That the Labour Party (your lot ) are
cynically tweaking the met office, putting in their own like mnided
people. The only thing I can agree with you on is that maybe I should
not post this stuff here. By the way I'm not part of the looney
right,
~~~~~~~~
Uk.politics.misc and alt.british. politics could do with your postings
Lawrence since your thoughts tend to be accurate insights into the way the
Elite rule this country.Notice how The infestation of the BBC with
Marxists and Marxist dogma (that we all pay for)is often reflected in the
rest of the media and your ordinary man in the street thinking is
frequently deemed politically incorrect by the thought police.It's the
Liberal Bigots that endanger free speech far more than Socialists.Don't be
silenced by them--we need you on our political forums.
WB

Don't get me wrong I used to champoin the BBC over all other forms of
independent Radio and TV media. I remember once a comparison being made in
the 70's as to defining the allways popular -and in my view nonsense -Tiz
Woz and the more polite well structered Saturday Morning "Swap Shop". It was
defined thus by who, I now can't remember: "Tiz Woz" is the sweet pudding
that's tasty but doesn't do you that much good; whereas "Swap Shop" os more
your meat, potatoes and lots of greens .

Anyhow since that the BBC has become increasingly a tool of the left. Just
listen to radio four it's almost wall to wall programmes about village life
in Zambia, or Somalian cirucumcision theres a few good science programmes
but it never ever looks at the fantastic achievments of western
civilisation medicine, light, meteorology even and so on.

The whole world will eventually benefit from the progress of the last 300
years that started in places like the UK. Now Marxist would argue it could
have stared anywhere once given the favourable conditions: well that may be
the case but it actually started and accelerated with what is now seen as a
dirty word, the west. All the bbc and their ilk do is look at every negative
like slavery and always fail to omit how poor conditions were for most.
Anyhow I digress slightly, yes I will pop over to Uk.politics.misc and
alt.british. politics and give all my good friends here a well deserved
rest. Especially Tudor who can now stop having to refute my inflammatory
comments and therefore give him more time to practise on his trombone, which
by his own addmission he could do better. Just to back up that last
statement: Tudor used to play at a pub just down the road from me ......it
has since closed ;-)