woger wrote:

Thank you, whoever you are.
It's nice to have someone on this forum who
knows the difference between weather and climate.

Everybody knows the weather changes more often
than the climate.

But you are one person who should have seen that
the statistical expectation of the annual global average
temperature should have shown a rise in those areas,
and only those areas where the temperature goes up and
through the freezing point of water.
Because of the latent heat of fusion, the frequency
of low day of year records has to be less than the high
day of year records, causing the anomalies to occur
more frequently with a plus sign.

But that false impression about warming has reached
a point where more rise is not likely, the silly averaging should
show a slow cooling back toward the baseline.

And the global warmers will gradually fade away,
hearing the chuckles of those who were not so gullible.

The Whatafool statistical expectation of a warming
aberration seems to parallel the IPCC predictions;

Warming, most evident in areas that go above and
below zero C,

A rapid rise over 30 or 40 years, then a slow decline,

Little or no effect in the tropics,

Not evident in all time record highs, few if any recently,

just a big global illusion interpreted by dummies as
a meaningful global change,

Maybe your son can explain it to you.