O wrote:

"Whata Fool" wrote in message
.. .
But that false impression about warming has reached
a point where more rise is not likely, the silly averaging should
show a slow cooling back toward the baseline.

And the global warmers will gradually fade away,
hearing the chuckles of those who were not so gullible.

The Whatafool statistical expectation of a warming
aberration seems to parallel the IPCC predictions;

Warming, most evident in areas that go above and
below zero C,

A rapid rise over 30 or 40 years, then a slow decline,

Little or no effect in the tropics,

Not evident in all time record highs, few if any recently,

just a big global illusion interpreted by dummies as
a meaningful global change,

Maybe your son can explain it to you.

You sure do make up some funny stuff! lol

Sorry, it would be funny if the end of the global warming
fad wouldn't be so traumatic for all the gullible believers.

Only in winter, only where it freezes, few record lows,
the latent heat of fusion makes water freezing more difficult.
Note that it is only the moist surface, mostly solid
surface that is moist that causes the aberration, and that
should make it very easy to check the theory against the
data set.

Climate statisticians should first look for things that
can cause errors or faults in the charts, even before they
make any conclusions.

And please learn to say "Satana Winds" instead
of Santa Ana Winds because the early Californians would
not have named bad winds after popular person.