"Szczepan Bia³ek" wrote:

"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" wrote
...
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan"
"The decline in global sink efficiency suggests that stabilization of
atmospheric CO2 is even more difficult to achieve than previously
thought," said
one of the study's authors, Corinne Le Quere, in the BAS statement.

"Szczepan Bia?k" wrote
Plants needs ALL (not only CO2) elements necessary to growth.

CO2 isn't an element.

"Szczepan Bia?k" wrote
The SO2 and fly ash are also necessary.

Ya, fly ash was in great abundance before the arrival of man.

Stupid.

You can easily calculate "The decline in global sink" if you assume that CO2
without the natural constituents of smoke is useless for plants. It is known
that the lack of one element restrain growth of plants. So you can calculate
the ratio between C and S in the natural smoke and next calculate the
quantity of useless CO2 (if you know the total quantity of S removed from
smoke).

Why would you call CO2 useless, it provides the carbon
for combining with hydrogen from water to build the hydrocarbons
it needs to grow.

And most of the oxygen is the only thing that is useless
to plant life.